Fishy Suddenness Of Catastrophic Abortion Billi

[Samm]

@Blackwolf

I understand. I wouldn’t want to try and defend that nonsense either.

@dantes

Which was unsupported by any factual basis.

You two should get together for drinks.

[dantes]

Making unsubstantiated statements of opinion is easy. Any Trump can do it.

[Samm]

So now you are a Trump supporter? Who knew.

[dantes]

Since when?

[Samm]

Since you just admitted it.

[Guvnah]

@Sherry_H

Doesn’t anyone wonder how several states All Of A Sudden have introduced these similar catastrophic thumbs up approvals for killing babies?

States that had previously been stymied by a split in legislative power but in this last election cycle found themselves controlled solely by Democrats are the ones it’s coming from. Without the balance of those pesty Republicans, they can grab for all the platform planks they can implement, and they’re wasting no time.

So what are they all grabbing first?

Abortion.

Not even the gay stuff. That’s secondary, I guess. Nope. Abortion it is.

And then our lib brethren on this board take umbrage at the notion that Dems are the party of abortion.

[Samm]

@dantes

Are you feeling okay? Now you’re just making things up to troll.

Just think of me as your mirror.

[pam95650]

The abortion changes only the number of doctors who would need to sign off on late term procedures.

“Currently, late-term abortions are legal in Virginia only under strict circumstances. The measure introduced by state Rep. Kathy Tran, a Democrat, would remove language requiring that a pregnancy’s risk to the mother be “substantial and irremediable.” The proposal would also change the number of doctors required to sign off on a late-term abortion, from three to one, provided that it is performed in a licensed hospital and that not doing so would “impair the mental or physical health” of the mother or result in her death. The governor, a pediatric neurologist, stressed that late-term abortions were done with the consent of the women and their doctors.
“And it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s nonviable,” Northam said.”

No, Virginia’s Governor Did Not Endorse Killing Babies

[Impenitent]

abort (kill) all the fetuses (babies) that aren’t perfect…

modern democratic eugenics

[thinkingman]

@dantes

Yeah. Tell that to refugees.

totally missed your meaning here sorry

[thinkingman]

@dantes

Hilarious. Boy everyone loves a good trivialization of this matter.

while developing human life is marginalized.

but dont criticize that, thats barbaric.

[thinkingman]

not just “not perfect” but not convenient

[Blackwolf]

Won’t make any difference, no matter how often it’s explained to them.

[Samson_Corwell]

@adroit

@Guvnah

VA governor said just that yesterday. (paraphrasing): “Resuscitate it if needed. (meaning the baby is BORN and ALIVE at that point) … and then the mother and provider can discuss it…” (Discuss WHAT? All that’s left at that point is “un-resuscitating” it!)

They euthanize Down Syndrome babies in Netherlands. Those babies are perfectly healthy and would live a full life if not killed.

It’s only a matter of time before we become that “progressive” ourselves.

The same thing that’s discussed when the decision to take any person off of life support and move to palliative care. The context of those comments are specifically with children that have severe defects that would otherwise lead to their death without being hooked up to machines.

That should be addressed in a separate bill, then. The whole deal with abortion has been about a woman’s autonomy versus what point of fetal development is considered a person. If a baby’s been born, then it no longer makes sense to link abortions into it.

[Samson_Corwell]

@Samm

…it allows non-resuscitation of a delivered baby that has not begun to breathe spontaneosly.

Was that prohibited prior to the introduction of this new bill?

[Samson_Corwell]

@Dissident_Aggressor

Abortion Billi can be found in your local seedy alley holding a coat hanger.

That isn’t an excuse for ■■■■ law.

[Samson_Corwell]

@lulubee

Then run for office where you will have a say in the crafting of bills.

Since you are not in any of these legislatures, what you want is of no consequence.

Cop out.

[Dissident_Aggressor]

@Samson_Corwell

That isn’t an excuse for ■■■■ law.

I was just making a joke based on the thread title. Crude one, yes, but a joke nonetheless. I have zero dogs in this fight.

[Samson_Corwell]

@Dissident_Aggressor

@Samson_Corwell

That isn’t an excuse for ■■■■ law.

I was just making a joke based on the thread title. Crude one, yes, but a joke nonetheless. I have zero dogs in this fight.

Okay. I thought you were making a comment about inevitability.

[Dissident_Aggressor]

@Samson_Corwell

Okay. I thought you were making a comment about inevitability.

See, I don’t even know what that means. I just thought the extra “I” in Bill in the thread title made it in funny. I’m probably a horrible person for joking about a serious topic.