42

Hey, since they’ve named all these space missions after pagan Greek gods there’s something else you can get your panties in a bunch about.

1 Like
43

That is what “transgender woman” is all about . If it was a real woman, your MSM wouldn’t have to use the word “transgender”. But “transgender woman” is just another language for “woman born with a penis”. And here you are trying to hide that fact.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/20/politics/dr-rachel-levine-admiral-transgender/index.html

You people use euphemisms so that you people can teach perversions to children . But “trans woman” means woman born with a penis. Every time you people or your mouthpieces, like CNN, say “trans woman” is just another language for " woman born with a penis". “Trans” is only a euphemism to hide that fact. And you are here trying to hide that fact too by ridiculing me so that I shut up about it. As you progs would say… .“precious”. :rofl:

44

I am not trying to hide anything. You see an article about future black and female astronauts on the moon and got so triggered that you came here to post about male genitalia.

Please note: the article in your OP says nothing about transgender, this is just your personal bugaboo.

2 Likes
45

Another poisoning the well thread. If conservatives aren’t comfortable with women or minorities going to the moon, just say it. As long as the individual is qualified, who cares?

1 Like
46

Two men will go… if anyone goes. One will pretend to be a woman and the other will be a normal competent man who is is brave enough to risk his life with a perversity diversity astronaut.

47

But the listed criteria for selection for the astronauts is their genitalia and skin melatonin, so why is it odd that this would be brought up in a discussion of whether these are proper selection criteria?

48

Yeah, yeah it’s totally normal to read an article about astronauts, and then take to the Hannity forum to rage about genitalia.:roll_eyes:

2 Likes
49

If the criteria for an astronaut is their genitalia, the people who made that a criteria already brought the subject up.

50

Misogyny. A cornerstone of the conservative ideology. Thanks for being upfront about it.

2 Likes
51

Dude… maybe you need to have a talk with Biden’s NASA.

“Through the Artemis program, we will see the first woman and first person of color walk on the surface of the Moon.”

In your mind, what criteria will they use to know if a prospective astronaut can check the block of “woman” to qualify for that moonwalk?

https://www.nasa.gov/artemis/woman-on-the-moon

1 Like
52

Is that why she was chosen?

53

Who was chosen? Have they named a female astronaut to land on the moon?

54

Ah… so you don’t consider a “trans woman” to be a real woman either! Who woulda thunk.

55

Keep digging that hole. Yikes.

1 Like
56

In your mind, is “female” the same as “woman”? NASA said “woman”.

57

and NASA aims to send the first woman and the first person of color on the moon in coming years.

OP Link

58

I read the OP link. I don’t see the name of the female astronaut. It’s hard to assess the qualifications of an unknown person. If someone has her name, I would look into her qualifications.

1 Like
59

We know two qualifications already.

60

So everytime we talk about women, you intend to rant about male genitalia?

How perfectly tedious.

1 Like
61

Who said they were qualifications? Are only women and minorities being selected? White males are disqualified and won’t be selected? Link please.

First woman and first person of color doesn’t mean no white men. It also doesn’t mean unqualified woman or person of color. I’m fully aware that’s what has been insinuated. Any woman or person of color will be automatically dismissed by some as unqualified or only chosen by physical characteristics. Only a white man can be qualified. That’s not a nee idea from conservatives.

1 Like