Interesting analogy to choose.
Why aren’t democrats at least going on the record to impeach? One offered up an article of impeachment D Sherman, he had one other Democratic supporter on it, D Green. Are they still afraid it would look like election interference? Or do they not really believe Trump is in Putin’s back pocket? Or do they think he is but don’t think that’s a serious enough problem to warrant impeachment? Just curious.
Crimea, murdered british citizens, interfered in our elections, supports Assad, ally with Iran…
I don’t know anything abut them, but the time to talk about impeachment - if it’s to be discussed at all - is after the Mueller investigation is concluded.
How do you feel about Trumps performance in Finland?
Obama wanted to issue a joint statement with the GOP - McConnel said no.
Oh, so you aren’t sure he’s in Putin’s pocket? Have you called Nancy Pelosi and told her she’s jumping the gun?
As for his performance in Finland, disgraceful and moronic.
I didn’t realize he needed McConnel’s permission, oh right, he didn’t. Why would you give the party compromised by America’s enemy a veto on saving the country again? That’s the best defense you can come up with?
So you believe that Trumps Director of National Intelligence is lying to Trump?
Any evidence or is this just based on your feeeeelings?
With all the Poe’ers and trolls here, do we have any real posters anymore?
It’s based on the amount of money he’s being paid.
Thinking is different than knowing. A suspicion requires evidence before such strong actions. The investigation continues.
You know this so quit playing stupid here.
Gee, this doesn’t look like speculation.
Stephen Cohen D-Tenn
Where are our military folks ? The Commander in Chief is in the hands of our enemy!
Neither does this
“President Trump’s weakness in front of Putin was embarrassing, and proves that the Russians have something on the President, personally, financially or politically,” the Democratic leader said in a statement after the president’s one-on-one meeting and presser with Putin in Helsinki.
I think this is a fair criticism, though we don’t really know exactly what was known at the time.
But it’s also fair to ask, what would you have Obama do? With out a smoking gun, you know the right would have claimed it was all political and would have seriously undermined the election, either way it went.
What is your explanation for Trump starting a trade war with allies, undermining NATO and siding with Putin over our intel agencies on the world stage in teh span of a week?
LOL at a GOP trump supporter birther condemning speculation.
Dude, I’m just telling you why they aren’t moving forward with action against Trump. You reply by showing some strong rhetoric. Doesn’t change why Dems aren’t moving forward. Even if an individual is 100% convinced Trump is compromised, he might still realize that a trial would require evidence.
Is this really hard for you to understand?
Maybe you should follow in the footsteps of your hero, Barack Hussein Obama, and go on a worldwide apology tour.
Oddly, no apology was ever given during that tour.
Yeah. Funny, isn’t it. No evidence.
He’s a moron. By the way, you know Obama levied some tariff’s too right?
President Obama slapped a stiff 35% tariff on Chinese tires in 2009 after American companies complained about unfair competition. They said China was flooding America with tires at low prices making it tough for U.S. companies to compete. The tire tariff gradually waned, and finally ended in 2012.
The tariff saved 1,200 U.S. tire jobs, which had been in sharp decline. And U.S. tire production rose after a major decline.
“Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires,” Obama said in his 2012 State of the Union address.