Why are the hiring requirements including carrying a weapon?
3 Likes
Axxowiz
22
Iām getting my stuff out of the safety deposit bank thank you, would rather take my chances with it hidden in the house than this ā ā ā ā ā Never say never could happen to you
2 Likes
So I found this
Supports your positions. But Iām not convinced the goobermint is completely forthcoming.
1 Like
The 87k number was from a Treasury report a full year before the bill. It does refer to hiring new agents, but also filling losses to attrition, spread over 10 years.
This notion of 87k armed agents (an army) is pure fiction
2 Likes
e7alr
26
One would think that the 4th Amendment, the requirement for due process and restrictions on the taking of property by the government will come into play. Has the issue of civil forfeiture without proof of criminal involvement reached the Supreme Court?
3 Likes
Camp
27
Biden is lying or bragging?
1 Like
Camp
28
Putting human resources into revenue collection instead of border security isnāt.
1 is too many and 87,000 is not enough.
Just look at this story for abuse of power.
3 Likes
In two cases SCOTUS was cool with it, but this action is a whole 'nuther animal.
Smyrna
30
The FBI lying again to a judge. Well nothing happened when they lied to a FISA Judge so I donāt expect this to be any different.
The real question Iāve got though isā¦where are the judges? If they were lied to, do they not have any recourse? If yes, why havenāt they exercised this authority in line with the laws broken?
2 Likes
JāBiden has no clue. He opened his pie hole and either read what one of the inept oafs wrote on the cue card or he repeated a number tossed around at a meeting while they fed him ice cream.
3 Likes
Nemesis
32
I agree this is total bollocks and should not happen.
Doesnt all off law enforcement have the right to asset forfeiture if they suspect its from proceeds of a crime?
I have read dozens of cases where police do this and unless you can afford great legal counsel your money is gone.
Perhaps knowing the JāBiden ā ā ā ā show has opened up a Pandoraās Box of criminal gang members streaming across Ol Folksy Joeās open borders, they are gearing up for an organized crime war with the human traffickers, drug and weapons cartels to forcibly seize their assets? You know those organized crime cartels are setting up shop in America and will be sitting on mountains of cash and property worth millions.
3 Likes
One of my boys got popped some years ago for possession of pot on his way to pay his rent. They confiscated his rent money (cash). In front of the judge the prosecutor portrayed him as a ānotorious drug dealerā and when his lawyer applied for the return of his rent money the prosecutor again claimed the cash was proceeds from his ācriminal enterpriseā. LOL The landlord was there as a witness and said the money was his and described the exact amount etc. Whatās curious is they took his money but not his car. The car was worth much more than the few hundred dollars. And the quantity of weed in his possession now is a misdemeanor citation/ pay the fine no court appearance. Aināt life a kick.
Nemesis
35
Unreal. Lucky he was able to have legal representation.
1 Like
Maryland. During the ā80ās Maryland legislature enacted strict drug possession and criminal distribution penalties because of the I-95 drug highway between Miami/ NY/ Boston. Theyāve relaxed pot simple possession to misdemeanor fines depending on quantity. But years ago if caught with a bag of weed for personal consumption? You would be facing felony Possession with intent to distribute, paraphernalia and jail time. Ridiculous. They filled the prisons up with pot heads and in my opinion ruined a lot of lives. I say that only because we witnessed it firsthand.
Adds whole new meaning to Chris Rockās how not to get beat up by the police when he says to leave your angry woman at home.
She always starting ā ā ā ā ā 
1 Like
tnt
40
If itās in a bank, I think youāre safe. This was a stand alone store that is accused of laundering money.
Regardless, this is ā ā ā ā ā ā up and if these allegations prove true someone should be fired, if not tried.