“Peter Strzok, who was singled out in a recent Justice Department inspector general report for the politically charged messages, would be willing to testify without immunity, and he would not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights in response to any question, his attorney, Aitan Goelman, said in an interview Sunday. Strzok has become a special target of President Trump, who has used the texts to question the Russia investigation”
So he’s going to say that his political biases, as extreme as they were, were not involved in any of his decision making…knowing that is not something that can be proven.
Big deal.
Not only was he on the email investigation, he inserted himself into the Mueller investigation. If he had any principles he would have recused himself from both…just as Mueller recused him when his history came to light.
Its not for nothing the IG said he made the FBI look bad.
Just a record of his lying to Congress, most notably about whether intelligence agencies gathered data on millions of Americans. The point is, you are fairly safe in lying to Congress.
One thing that’s fairly amazing is the code by conservatives to presume crimes based on guessing. This is different than a newspaper reporting facts with sources (including anonymous ones), but just all around labeling and guessing that people have committed crimes. It’s all through this thread. Too bad it doesn’t work that way.