Fauci Says OK To Vote In Person

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

thats not a reason to add other fraud prone processes to the voting system

Online banking is fraud prone. Having something prone to fraud isn’t a reason to not do something. Risk/Benefit analysis is needed.

So I ask again, a different way, if I told you the voting system was 99% effective… would you stop using it because it’s not 100%?

[sikofit]

@WuWei

@sikofit

@thinkingman

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

is the percentage 0?

no

then potential is there

What’s acceptable? We can’t have a 100% perfect system

thats not a reason to add other fraud prone processes to the voting system

The more people who vote and get engaged in the political process the better

Looking at facebook and twitter, I’m going to have to disagree.

The people on Facebook making stupid political posts already vote. The more Americans with a voice the better

[WuWei]

@sikofit

The people on Facebook making stupud political posts already vote. The more Americans with a voice the better

I didn’t say anything about political posts.

[thinkingman]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

thats not a reason to add other fraud prone processes to the voting system

Online banking is fraud prone. Having something prone to fraud isn’t a reason to not do something. Risk/Benefit analysis is needed.

So I ask again, a different way, if I told you the voting system was 99% effective… would you stop using it because it’s not 100%?

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

this is not comparable to mail voting.

[sikofit]

@thinkingman

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

thats not a reason to add other fraud prone processes to the voting system

Online banking is fraud prone. Having something prone to fraud isn’t a reason to not do something. Risk/Benefit analysis is needed.

So I ask again, a different way, if I told you the voting system was 99% effective… would you stop using it because it’s not 100%?

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

this is not comparable to mail voting.

You’re right. Voting is a right enshrined in the Constitution, banking is not

[thinkingman]

@sikofit

@thinkingman

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

thats not a reason to add other fraud prone processes to the voting system

Online banking is fraud prone. Having something prone to fraud isn’t a reason to not do something. Risk/Benefit analysis is needed.

So I ask again, a different way, if I told you the voting system was 99% effective… would you stop using it because it’s not 100%?

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

this is not comparable to mail voting.

You’re right. Voting is a right enshrined in the Constitution, banking is not

thats not what i said

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

Huh? Besides protecting life… what is more important than protecting money?

Is 99% effectiveness against fraud a good number to move forward with mail-in voting?

[sikofit]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

Huh? Besides protecting life… what is more important than protecting money?

Is 99% effectiveness against fraud a good number to move forward with mail-in voting?

And why aren’t we required to pay our taxes in person? Seems like a lot of potential for fraud exists there

[thinkingman]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

Huh? Besides protecting life… what is more important than protecting money?

Is 99% effectiveness against fraud a good number to move forward with mail-in voting?

theres no way to guarantee the amount of fraud for this election, given the derangement we see, the number of situations where fraud occurred, and the potential for fraud on a larger scale

[LucyLou]

@thinkingman

@LucyLou

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

the need for mail voting narrative is dead

wonder how hard democrats will push for it anyway

Not at all… smaller crowds lessens the chance of transmittal.

no need to reduce crowd size by avoiding polls fauci sez

narrative - dead

go ahead, struggle

Actually he said, “If you go and wear a mask, if you observe the physical distancing, and don’t have a crowded situation, there’s no reason why shouldn’t be able to do that.”

A great way to avoid a “crowded situation” would be voting by mail.

thats one way yes

another way is the way people avoid crowds at wal-mart

One can’t go wandering around into different aisles in a line for voting like one can at Walmart.

This is why mail in voting is a crucial and safer alternative.

one doesnt have to “wander”

mail in voting is not “crucial”

youre attempting to re-build the narrative that fauci just destroyed

Yes, one does have to wander to maintain social distancing in a Walmart.

If masks. If social distancing. If no crowds.

I know there will be people with no masks, or won’t social distance, and there will be crowds at my polling location. That’s why I am taking Fauci’s advice and doing mail in voting.

[thinkingman]

@sikofit

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

online banking is avail based on better business decisions for more profit and customer satisfaction, as an outgrowth of technological advancement.

Huh? Besides protecting life… what is more important than protecting money?

Is 99% effectiveness against fraud a good number to move forward with mail-in voting?

And why aren’t we required to pay our taxes in person? Seems like a lot of potential for fraud exists there

this is not an argument for mail voting

but less fraud might take place if people paid bills/taxed in person

far as im concerned, thats a good reason to transact in person

[sikofit]

@LucyLou

@thinkingman

@LucyLou

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

the need for mail voting narrative is dead

wonder how hard democrats will push for it anyway

Not at all… smaller crowds lessens the chance of transmittal.

no need to reduce crowd size by avoiding polls fauci sez

narrative - dead

go ahead, struggle

Actually he said, “If you go and wear a mask, if you observe the physical distancing, and don’t have a crowded situation, there’s no reason why shouldn’t be able to do that.”

A great way to avoid a “crowded situation” would be voting by mail.

thats one way yes

another way is the way people avoid crowds at wal-mart

One can’t go wandering around into different aisles in a line for voting like one can at Walmart.

This is why mail in voting is a crucial and safer alternative.

one doesnt have to “wander”

mail in voting is not “crucial”

youre attempting to re-build the narrative that fauci just destroyed

Yes, one does have to wander to maintain social distancing in a Walmart.

If masks. If social distancing. If no crowds.

I know there will be people with no masks, or won’t social distance, and there will be crowds at my polling location. That’s why I am taking Fauci’s advice and doing mail in voting.

Same here. I live in a conservative enclave within California where mask wearing is spotty at best

[LucyLou]

The end of Fauci’s statement:
“I mean, obviously if you’re a person who is compromised physically or otherwise, you don’t want to take the chance. There’s the situation of mail-in voting that has been done for years in many places. So there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to vote in person or otherwise.”

REPEAT: “There’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to vote in person OR OTHERWISE.”

Everyone should have the otherwise option. I believe most people do. That will be my choice.

[fallenturtle]

@sikofit

@LucyLou

@thinkingman

@LucyLou

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

the need for mail voting narrative is dead

wonder how hard democrats will push for it anyway

Not at all… smaller crowds lessens the chance of transmittal.

no need to reduce crowd size by avoiding polls fauci sez

narrative - dead

go ahead, struggle

Actually he said, “If you go and wear a mask, if you observe the physical distancing, and don’t have a crowded situation, there’s no reason why shouldn’t be able to do that.”

A great way to avoid a “crowded situation” would be voting by mail.

thats one way yes

another way is the way people avoid crowds at wal-mart

One can’t go wandering around into different aisles in a line for voting like one can at Walmart.

This is why mail in voting is a crucial and safer alternative.

one doesnt have to “wander”

mail in voting is not “crucial”

youre attempting to re-build the narrative that fauci just destroyed

Yes, one does have to wander to maintain social distancing in a Walmart.

If masks. If social distancing. If no crowds.

I know there will be people with no masks, or won’t social distance, and there will be crowds at my polling location. That’s why I am taking Fauci’s advice and doing mail in voting.

Same here. I live in a conservative enclave within California where mask wearing is spotty at best

I live in San Francisco where we’re all good little worker bees and wear masks. Except Sam. WE SEE YOU SAM.

I just don’t think its a good idea to vote in person… and that’s fine because the more people who would prefer to vote by mail than in person means the less people to make the in person polling location go from maintained to high-risk.

[PurpnGold]

@sikofit

And why aren’t we required to pay our taxes in person? Seems like a lot of potential for fraud exists there

Why let a third party process tax returns? Lots of potential there

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

theres no way to guarantee the amount of fraud for this election, given the derangement we see, the number of situations where fraud occurred, and the potential for fraud on a larger scale

What is an acceptable percentage of fraud? 1%? 2%?

[zantax]

@sikofit

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

@fallenturtle

@thinkingman

the need for mail voting narrative is dead

wonder how hard democrats will push for it anyway

Not at all… smaller crowds lessens the chance of transmittal.

no need to reduce crowd size by avoiding polls fauci sez

narrative - dead

go ahead, struggle

Actually he said, “If you go and wear a mask, if you observe the physical distancing, and don’t have a crowded situation, there’s no reason why shouldn’t be able to do that.”

A great way to avoid a “crowded situation” would be voting by mail.

thats one way yes

another way is the way people avoid crowds at wal-mart

Shop online?

Yeah, no room for social distancing in lines, outdoors

Yeah, I will voting by mail instead of exposing myself to that

And why would it be that? Wh would your local government not adhere to good practice and only let a safe number of people inside and make the rest wait outside where there is ample room to social distance. They could even pretend they know what century they are in and allow people to text in for a return text when it is their turn, allowing them to stay out of the weather in their cars.

Somehow businesses manage to pull it off.

[sikofit]

@zantax

.

Somehow businesses manage to pull it off.

Usually in a reduced capacity and also altering the way they operate. You lnow, like the states that expanded their mail-in option.

[thinkingman]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

theres no way to guarantee the amount of fraud for this election, given the derangement we see, the number of situations where fraud occurred, and the potential for fraud on a larger scale

What is an acceptable percentage of fraud? 1%? 2%?

0 if attainable. and it is.

[Forcefield]

I was always going to vote in person. Still “like” Fauci. Do you guys think this is a gotcha moment? Weird.