Doesn’t take a long-timer to recognize the feces put out by the leftists on this board.

I don’t need to spend the night in an outhouse to know it stinks.

Apparently you would set up housekeeping.

1 Like

Apparently the left is fine with perjury as long as their gal is the one doing it.

If Fani and Nathan get away with that crime how can she ever honestly prosecute anyone after her own perjury…

How can that judge operate his court after allowing the district attorney to get away with perjury.

What the “defenders of democracy and our institution’s” Are doing to this country is insane and destructive.

6 Likes

And grifting.

1 Like

The lefties in this country lay out a perfect example of what hate, pure unadulterated hatred, can do to people.

Here is a proverb that they will obviously ignore but will post it anyway as might help someone.

Holding onto hatred is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die.

1 Like

Good point

1 Like

facts aint feces.

you cant tell the difference.

sad.

Allan

Perhaps your ears need cleaning.

Correct.

And of the two the only one leftists post consistently is the feces.

Are you in middle school?

Are you SOC?

:rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::roll_eyes::rofl::roll_eyes::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::roll_eyes::rofl::joy::rofl::joy::rofl::joy:

And the entire community say’s together……

NOT a flipping chance!

Saying extramarital affairs bring distrust without even a speckle of irony is quite the feat

1 Like

It’s amazing to me.

how is it okay for a prosecutor to commit perjury? Also the idea that she did not financially benefit from putting her boyfriend on the team to the tune of 600K is willful ignorance.

regardless of the grounds used to disqualify her the idea that there is no bias against Trump from her is ludicrous.

6 Likes

[

OK, so first, there is no evidence that she committed perjury. Just because her testimony differed from another witness does not equal perjury. Besides the only relevant difference was when the relationship started. Ultimately, that was not a dispositive fact as found by the Court.’

Secondly, at most he spent about $12,000 on her over the course of about 6-7 trips, hardly lavish vacations, and again, not a fact that the Court found dispositive.’ As to the total amount, no one has really questioned that he earned the money. This is a “drop everything” situation, so this may well have been all he worked on.

Finally, of course Fani Willis had a bias against Trump. That’s why there was a special counsel.

thats a lie. the phone records prove it.

about which she perjured herself

as ignored by the court

600K to her boyfriend.

4 Likes

personal vs professional

That neither is astute enough to discern this major factor is disappointing to me.

1 Like

What’s a profesional affair? :joy:

Discernment my gosh. So sad

You are trying so hard to make it rifferent you call a sexual affair professional

1 Like

It’s not about the booty call. And you know it.

1 Like

Of course it’s not. It’s about public funds. I am just enjoying some people’s pretzels.

1 Like

I can’t tell if you’re just playing stupid? :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass: