Face it libs, your people are animals.(revised)

Politics
152

Physical contact without consent is abhorrent, yes.

Regardless of what party the perp represents.

2 Likes
153

I support putting down any violent protestors with violence. But they better actually be violent. Not just rolling up and randomly throwing people into unmarked vans for no apparent reason.

154

That is violence. Rape is violence. Disgusting to wish it on another person.

2 Likes
155

But you canā€™t see why your insistence on this train of thought might be problematic.

3 Likes
156

What future does the nation have with progressive single-party rule? How do you feel about Supreme Court expansion and adding new states to increase Democratic majorities? I despise that this election is once again a choice between lesser evils, but these ideas are gaining mainstream attraction amongst Democratic politicians. Your voice matters now, but it might not in the future should they prevail.

157

I donā€™t do that. I have never had riot training. But police and the national guard have. Just let them do their jobs and end it.

The Cincinnati Po-leece did a great job. They brought in a bunch of busses and parked them in a big lot. They approached the rioters from three sides, like a spartan phalanx. Herded them into the lot, zipped tied them, loaded them on to the busses and away they went. Cincinnati hasnā€™t had riots in months.

Sound good?

2 Likes
158

Agreed.

Once upon a time, some libs condemned the kid sniffer for perving on little kids, but that was before he became their man of the hour. :man_shrugging:

159

I despise them. Rednecks are no better than Antifa. Now. Your turn.

Would you support using force to shut this crap down? Is it time to say enough is enough?

160

Once upon a time, some cons might have blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. But that was before the GOP was led by Trump.

Consistency.

7 Likes
161

I can see why libs would need to believe all that in order to justify their vote for the kid sniffer. :man_shrugging:

1 Like
162

Madam president. Lol

1 Like
163

I remember, once upon a time, that accusations of marital infidelity actually shut down a candidateā€™s campaign for president (Gary Hart, 1988)

3 Likes
165

Itā€™s been a few minutes. Time to denounce The Boogaloo Boys otherwise you support them.

See that kind of logic is stupid.

I know most people do not stand with them. Thatā€™s just common sense. It would be nice if the same common sense could be applied to other here.

166

youā€™re right, ā€œsomeā€ cons never actually blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. They just pretended.

1 Like
167

This is an almost exact repeat of the last post seeking to justify a vote for the kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived justification.

168

You can count on Democrats ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  up ā€œsingle party ruleā€. You can bank on it with more certainty than the sure knowledge that Thomas Brady, quarterback, will cheat and get away with it.

169

Right because their solution is anarchy, not democracy

1 Like
170

Well, talk to any given anarchist, and you are going to get a predictably vast number of disagreements with that summation.

171

Iā€™m not voting for kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived assumption.

172

Voting third party, eh? Good on you.