I despise them. Rednecks are no better than Antifa. Now. Your turn.
Would you support using force to shut this crap down? Is it time to say enough is enough?
I despise them. Rednecks are no better than Antifa. Now. Your turn.
Would you support using force to shut this crap down? Is it time to say enough is enough?
Once upon a time, some libs condemned the kid sniffer for perving on little kids, but that was before he became their man of the hour.
Once upon a time, some cons might have blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. But that was before the GOP was led by Trump.
Consistency.
I can see why libs would need to believe all that in order to justify their vote for the kid sniffer.
Madam president. Lol
Once upon a time, some cons might have blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. But that was before the GOP was led by Trump.
Consistency.
I remember, once upon a time, that accusations of marital infidelity actually shut down a candidate’s campaign for president (Gary Hart, 1988)
mollyBrown: altair1013:Would you support using force to shut this crap down? Is it time to say enough is enough?
You didn’t denounce the proud boys. It was only the Boogaloo boys. Do you denounce the Proud Boys? How would I know you don’t support their terrible messages?
I despise them. Rednecks are no better than Antifa. Now. Your turn.
Would you support using force to shut this crap down? Is it time to say enough is enough?
It’s been a few minutes. Time to denounce The Boogaloo Boys otherwise you support them.
See that kind of logic is stupid.
I know most people do not stand with them. That’s just common sense. It would be nice if the same common sense could be applied to other here.
I can see why libs would need to believe all that in order to justify their vote for the kid sniffer.
you’re right, “some” cons never actually blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. They just pretended.
This is an almost exact repeat of the last post seeking to justify a vote for the kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived justification.
You can count on Democrats ■■■■■■■ up “single party rule”. You can bank on it with more certainty than the sure knowledge that Thomas Brady, quarterback, will cheat and get away with it.
Anarchists don’t tend towards electoralism.
Right because their solution is anarchy, not democracy
Well, talk to any given anarchist, and you are going to get a predictably vast number of disagreements with that summation.
This is an almost exact repeat of the last post seeking to justify a vote for the kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived justification.
I’m not voting for kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived assumption.
SixFoot:This is an almost exact repeat of the last post seeking to justify a vote for the kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived justification.
I’m not voting for kid sniffer.
Voting third party, eh? Good on you.
This is an almost exact repeat of the last post seeking to justify a vote for the kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived justification.
Not a justification, just bizarre that you are repeatedly virtue signalling about kid sniffers yet silent when it comes to Trump’s past.
SixFoot:Once upon a time, some libs condemned the kid sniffer for perving on little kids, but that was before he became their man of the hour.
Once upon a time, some cons might have blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. But that was before the GOP was led by Trump.
Would you support using force to shut the riots down? Is it time to say enough is enough?
Not a justification
It is, that’s why “but Trump!” is always the go to.
SixFoot:This is an almost exact repeat of the last post seeking to justify a vote for the kid sniffer. I get it, it would be really uncomfortable without a perceived justification.
Not a justification, just bizarre that you are repeatedly virtue signalling about kid sniffers yet silent when it comes to Trump’s past.
Great. You made your personal judgement. That’s awesome. Let’s refocus for a second.
Would you support using force to shut the riots down? Is it time to say enough is enough?
SixFoot:I can see why libs would need to believe all that in order to justify their vote for the kid sniffer.
you’re right, “some” cons never actually blanched at the thought of someone associating with Epstein, committing adultery with a porn star, and then paying her hush money. They just pretended.
Don’t forget walking in on teen girls changing. Klassy.
It is, that’s why “but Trump!” is always the go to.
Hardly. My bringing up Trump in the context of you virtue signalling about Biden is entirely justified. Why is your concern about these sorts of things limited by partisanship?
Sorry, Six and I are discussing something else at the moment.
Thank you.