EXCLUSIVE: Trump says he would take information again if foreigners offered dirt on opponents

[kingarthur65]

@WuWei

I don’t recognize state bars. I’m global.

I assume, the state bars don’t recognize you either.

Doesn’t matter. I out lawyered your lawyer last night. I’m the champ.

I’m not a lawyer either, but I do know some of the most prominent civil trial lawyers in the country. I seriously doubt that you out lawyered any of them.
If you’d like to try out lawyering one of them, I suggest you grab a bottle of bourbon and meet up at the next convention.

[conan]

I don’t know…how about that taste of your own medicine?

[Tilly_jow]

@WuWei

@Tilly_jow

He doesn’t. He gave-up on morals some time back when it comes to libs.

Why are you attacking me personally? I haven’t said a word to you all day.

You’re right in this case, I gave up on morals some time back when it comes to libs. I no longer expect morals or honesty from libs. Nor common sense.

It really wasn’t meant to a personal attack, just the obvious reading of your personal position. You’d climb in bed with the devil against the left. Just like the generals of a certain mid 30’s European army.

Note: Most of these general were not members a political party.

[zantax]

@Blackwolf

Is there anyone left who still defends Donald because they genuinely think he’s a good man and a patriot putting country before himself?

I could care less about him. I am more concerned with everyone’s rights. If the government can make it illegal for him to listen to foreigners, it can make it illegal for anyone. Even Hillary had every right to hear what the Kremlin sources she paid for opposition research had to say about Trump.

[SeaManatee]

@conan

I told you who and what Wray was the moment they hired him. Nothing change. He’s as much of insider as they come.

He will do whatever it take to protect his beloved agency.

I don’t believe you, i believe Trump. He only hires the best people.

[Blackwolf]

Tastes like peas!

Or chicken. Or chicken peas.

(It’s okay, you’ve made it clear what fuels your ardent defense/support of Donald. No ideology could have withstood that, let alone conservatism)

[Blackwolf]

@zantax

I could care less about him.

I understand. It’s an almost universal response from nearly all Trump supporters these days.

No one wants to cop to actually liking the guy, and who can blame them?

[zantax]

@Blackwolf

@zantax

I could care less about him.

I understand. It’s an almost universal response from nearly all Trump supporters these days.

No one wants to cop to actually liking the guy, and who can blame them?

That has been my consistent opinion from the day he entered the race, not like I made a secret of it here. I don’t like him one bit. That doesn’t mean I am giving up the first amendment to make liberals happy.

[kingarthur65]

@zantax

Is there anyone left who still defends Donald because they genuinely think he’s a good man and a patriot putting country before himself?

I could care less about him. I am more concerned with everyone’s rights. If the government can make it illegal for him to listen to foreigners, it can make it illegal for anyone. Even Hillary had every right to hear what the Kremlin sources she paid for opposition research had to say about Trump.

He can listen all he wants. The issue here is did his campaign receive anything of value? If so, that needs to be reported to the FBI.

[zantax]

I must have missed that bit in the first amendment, the part where you only have free speech outside of elections if the government determines that speech has value.

[tnt]

@peek-a-boo

No excuses. This kind of stuff happens all the time in politics. It has never been a problem, except now. Why? Well because its Trump.

Everything that has pretty much been standard practice in politics over the years suddenly is no longer ok, because Trump is doing it.

Sooooooooooooooo………………………….

yawn!

link to a campaign taking help from a foreign government?

[kingarthur65]

@zantax

I must have missed that bit in the first amendment, the part where you only have free speech outside of elections if the government determines that speech has value.

Yeah. I guess you did miss that part.

[tnt]

@zantax

Want to guess where he was getting his information? Go ahead, guess.

You didn’t answer the question.

[zantax]

Points you to the Steele dossier sources again…

[zantax]

Because it doesn’t exist. I don’t know why you insist on putting these lovely fish in the barrel, it makes it kind of easy to catch them.

[kingarthur65]

@zantax

Because it doesn’t exist. I don’t know why you insist on putting these lovely fish in the barrel, it makes it kind of easy to catch them.

FEC laws. I provided a link earlier.

[zantax]

Yes, you did, mind showing the class when those laws have ever been used to count mere information as a political contribution?

[tnt]

@conan

I said well over a decade here…cons biggest weakness is their morals. Libs prey on them.

Now the gig is up…libs don’t have clue what to do except bitch and moan.

Which morals are those? The morals that lead to pathological lying, or the morals that lead to ■■■■■■■ a porn star while your wife is at home with your new born?

[tnt]

@zantax

Points you to the Steele dossier sources again…

When was the country of Steele recognized?

[peek-a-boo]

Let’s keep it simple; Hillary campaign and the Steele Dossier?