840

Vladimir Putin hearts your answer.

She’s the government official in charge of elections. You’re making this so much of a laugher it should be embarrassing.

Again, when you get the offer you call. You don’t wait. Waiting and receiving the info is illegal.

And this is sadly not becoming any kind of a real discussion because the evidence has been presented to you by more than one person and you’ve ignored it. The need to stick up for Trump is frankly disturbing.

1 Like
841

Exclusive! Stunning Interview!

842

We don’t actually know that they got them. No one does - not even Trump.

That’s why it was a joke. The only way we as Americans will ever get to see what Clinton was trying to hide was if indeed the Russians had hacked her.

That was the irony of it.

But for a moment, let’s say they had them. Are you saying if they offered them to us we should refuse them???

Those are our records. They may be critical in assessing a lot of what happened during her tenure as SecDef. Why would we NOT take them back?

But no worries. They would never admit to having them, in any case.

M

1 Like
843

So does The Daily Mail.

She a political hack and a moron if she thinks you cannot get legitimate information from any source, any time.

And you STILL HAVEN’T answered my question. I’ll ask it again:

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE for the Clinton campaign to use information from Ukraine to attack Paul Manafort, and yet she was not arrested and got no FEC violation for doing so?

waiting…

M

844

#factsmatter

845

You did notice the source of this – Mother Jones – and the author, right? David Corn, co-author of “Russian Roulette”. Just saying…

846

Trump Jr. is not only dumb but he also has plenty of holes in his memory. His 2017 testimony has a lot of missing pieces to it because he says his memory failed him.

847

And to think you use to post motherjohns news all the time here…and now they’re bad?

What changed?

1 Like
848

I didn’t say they were bad, did I? I like them very much, actually. Corn, too. I read “Russian Roulette.” Great book. You should read it.

849

Yes we do. They were stolen via illegal hacking by Russia.

Here it is… it’s either a joke… take him serious, not literally or he’s not a politician. He can never be taken at face value.

850

He. Bungled that one…you charge him and fine him…

851

Irrelevant. The poster’s question was answered.

The dossier was known about and speculated about before the election. Or are we pretending that didn’t happen either? My, but revisionist history is becoming quite fashionable lately.

852

World leaders all around the globe weighed in on how bad a choice Trump would be, it was widely reported in the US and I didn’t see a single democrat complain about it as foreign influence on our elections.

2 Likes
853

You don’t know that.

854

You need to let this one go… let me handle cyber hacking triage and forensics.

855

The problem is that THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN GAVE POLLING DATA TO RUSSIA, who used it to try to influence the election in battleground states. I think they succeeded, but even if they didn’t, that is still conspiracy.

Can you think of any other explanation for Manafort’s giving internal polling data to Putin?

856

No, you don’t know that. You know only what you have been told by people with a vested interest in it being Russia.

857

Did Mueller indict him for it?

858

No, we know that to the greatest extent possible when dealing with cyber threats. If you are asking if we are 100% sure… the answer is no. It’s never 100%. However the markers of that attack are 100% identical with that APT (advance persistent threat).

Signatures are key here… can I forge my Dads signature? Sure. But think of cyber TTPs (tactics techniques and procedures) as if I am trying to write a 5000 word essay in my dads handwriting. The chance that I get through that paper without making a mistake is HIGHLY UNLIKELY.

859

Point stands. Markers can be copied. Signatures forged.

Are you willing to go to war over it?