When their traditional voting base started to see their real agenda and began to walk away, and the Dems needed a replacement voting block of new social welfare dependents.
Instead of asserting, canntou provide quotes?
Thanks.
I’m sure someone already mentioned this but decriminalizing doesn’t equate to open borders.
Anything on the Democrat Politicians Socialist Agenda is slowly pushed and put in place over time. It takes years of planning, and passing orders, and laws, and bills that allow their Agenda to become possible.
And they do this under the table so to speak. They don’t want Americans to know directly that they’re doing these kinds of things, because if their Liberal Fake News Media friends actually put things like that on the news, people would have stopped voting for Democrat Politicians a long time ago.
Weather it’s Illegal Immigration, or anything else that goes against what the Democrat Politicians promise America they’re going to do, especially the bigger things, need to be THROWN out into the publics view, so they can be exposed for what their true intentions are.
The thing is, once they’ve brainwashed enough people, the things that they’ve taken years to plan, finally come to fourwishen, and can almost just take care of themselves.
Yep. Just can’t be detained for being illegal, which is just short of blanket amnesty.
1 Like
WuWei
191
What level should we tolerate? What was the previous tolerance level?
You do realize people bring zero tolerance on themselves through abuse of tolerance, right?
WuWei
192
So what? Your complaint is he doesn’t President like the others? Did Obama?
WuWei
193
Well, Reid went nuclear in 2013. Think that was it?
If it’s no longer a crime to be here illegally, what’s the rationale for detaining them?
JayJay
196
Seeing as you are from Canada I could see why you wouldn’t mind that…
My complaint is that he is separating families for the purpose of deterring immigration and it has failed bigly.
That was awfully circular, Sneaky. Still back to the same claim I made.
Can you only detain people for criminal acts?
WuWei
199
That’s not the claim you made in the post I quoted. He gets to be inconsistent with past administrations. He’s the President and doesn’t have to be consistent with obama policy. Obama policy lost.
Obamacare failed bigly. Obama created a policy that was inconsistent with administrations of the past.
Why has this policy failed? Because you (collective) don’t have the stomach for it or because they don’t care about their kids?
Can’t detain them for civil affairs.
[quote=“kingarthur65, post:197, topic:195932”]
My complaint is that he is separating families for the purpose of deterring immigration and it has failed bigly. [/quote]
Do you think citizens caught commiting crimes should be immune from detention if they have children?
Do you think the threat of being separated from family has a deterent effect on a percentage of the population tempted to commit a crime?
It wasn’t Obama’s policy. It was also Bush’s policy, it was Clinton’s policy. I’ve already answered this question. Just like your last question. This is not circular anymore, it’s repetitive.
You are actually supporting the policy of separating families. Not just defending them. Now you are supporting them.
Is their only crime illegally crossing the border? I’m going to assume that is the case because it is very difficult for these people to commit a crime while in detention.
I think there are legitimate reasons to separate families. Using a child as a shield should not and is not allowed, but that isn’t the policy. The policy was created to be universal.
The WH thought this would deter families from immigrating. It was publicly stated by Sessions and others in the WH. It has not worked.
FYI, you quoted post 13 in this thread. Since that post there has been some round about dialogue on the questions I put forth in the OP but no direct answers.
Citizens of the US don’t need to illegally cross the border coming in. I asked about citizens committing crimes. Here it is again -
