statistically, zero children have been shown to spread covid to adults. the only dubious conclusion is that zero is a meaningful number showing spread.

The Kaiser Family Foundation’s findings along with the newer studies coming out differ from your unsupported opinion

2 Likes

180,000 new cases in kids in the past 30 days. Deaths are thankfully not spiking but hospitalizations are. A hybrid system for schools really is the only way imo

you really should read your links before you post them.

there is nothing new here. its the same assumption about viral loads and the same non reviewed SK study that says it doesn’t know which way transmission went. There is nothing here that’s not already known. This study claims the SK study showed transmission, not even the SK study claimed that. It claims that because of viral load its possible (they actually go beyond possible, with no support for the claim other than their assumption). The claims in this story are unsupported by evidence

no issues with that, we should be safe because of all we don’t know. what we should not do is make decisions based on unsupported fears

No, statistically when we see clusters of illness popping up in child-dominated sub-populations, and popping up more and more as kids start heading back into their groups that we shut down with school shutdowns, the odds it’s always the adults doing the spread are slim…no matter whether you have seen a definitive contract trace of a kid to an adult or not.

And more news pours in.

Florida’s cases in children up 137% (90% increase in children nationwide).
Hopsitalizations among children in that state have increased 105%.

I don’t know how much more evidence has to come in to break this arrogance some people have that children are invulnerable.

3 Likes

science first. I’m not saying the assumption doesn’t make sense, just that scientifically, its meaningless. correlation does not equal causation. it may suggest it, thats what research is for. to date. exactly zero cases of a child spreading the disease to an adult. thats a statistic with scientific meaning. can they? maybe. seems likely. have we seen it? no.

The issue is many schools are not really set up to deliver the hybrid model.

More and more are finding out they can’t do it and maintain good safety practices.

who said their invulnerable? not me. to date, out of 300,000 kids who’ve contracted covid. 15 deaths. out of 160,000. 15. thats a statistic with meaning to

Its a good thing Covid doesn’t cause residual damage. Oh wait.

and you have zero evidence this is true in kids.

I assumed we were talking about norms, not outliers.

MIS-C existed before covid was ever seen. What caused it then? Yes, it is sad kids get it, yes, contacting covid seems to make the tiny fraction of kids who have more severe covid symptoms more marginally more susceptible, so a fraction of a fraction of the already low percentage of kids may have this complication. Not sure it amounts to many more than would have gotten it anyway though

We have no idea yet exactly how prevalent the side effects are and are starting to see lung damage even in asymptomatic carriers. The point being that with so much still unknown it’s really not that wise to be gambling with our children’s futures until we get some better answers.