Emails show Proof of Direct Conflict of Interest

conan · 2018-10-18T23:40:57.424Z

And millions paid out.

party-free · 2018-10-18T23:55:18.177Z

WuWei:

CNN is not fake news.

The quote from my post was from your CNN article.

calirepub · 2018-10-18T23:57:50.249Z

Nobody really cares if Donald Trump has conflicts of interest. All presidents had those. Libs are only using this to attack the president. They don’t really care.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T12:38:21.439Z

You got him THIS time!.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T12:40:52.631Z

party-free:

September 28, 2017 - The Treasury Inspector General of Tax Administration issues a new report that finds liberal-leaning groups may have also been subjected to extra scrutiny when they sought tax-exempt status.

But there was no “may have” about it.

Audit indicates liberal nonprofits also got extra IRS scrutiny - POLITICO

https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/355301-the-scandal-of-the-irs-targeting-groups-based-on-politics-is-a

IRS targeted pro-border security groups for illegal scrutiny: Audit - Washington Times

Like I said, the scandal that alleged involved undue targeting of TP/conservative groups is #FakeNews because it targeted ANY potentially political group. The only scandal was the perpetual victimhood of TP types who always thought 0bummer was out to get them

White people were lynched too back in the day.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T12:49:50.635Z

PizzaReverend:

Cratic3947:

PizzaReverend:

Cratic3947:

“Today, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the wife beater”…

First off, what?

Second off, seriously, what the hell?

Third off, a quick google search shows nothing of the kind. Which right wing mouthpiece fed you this garbage?

Fourth off, “President Donald Trump, rapist, sexual deviant, and serial adulterer…”, except mine is accurate.

Oh, Sorry wrong democrat , the head of the party is a wife beater…

Which “head of the party” are you talking about?

And does it compare at all to the time Trump raped Ivana? Because I bet it doesn’t.

“That was all just the lawyers’ talk”, she said, after having previously clarified she did not accuse him in “a literal or criminal sense”.

The Independent – 10 Oct 17

Ivana Trump speaks out on allegations Donald Trump raped her

Former model made rape allegation in 1991 during couple's divorce

Whoops.

DMK · 2018-10-21T12:55:03.590Z

PizzaReverend:

To coin a phrase, Lock Him Up!

I would prefer a firing squad, guillotine and electric chair used simultaneously. Throw in some stoning, too.

sikofit · 2018-10-21T15:42:22.053Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

“That was all just the lawyers’ talk”, she said, after having previously clarified she did not accuse him in “a literal or criminal sense”.

Looks she forgot about the sworn deposition she signed that said he raped her is

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T16:27:04.728Z

sikofit:

Call_me_Ishmael:

“That was all just the lawyers’ talk”, she said, after having previously clarified she did not accuse him in “a literal or criminal sense”.

Looks she forgot about the sworn deposition she signed that said he raped her is

She clarified. Apparently her lawyers made it up and told her to sign. Who reads the fine print?

sikofit · 2018-10-21T17:04:24.420Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

She clarified. Apparently her lawyers made it up and told her to sign. Who reads the fine print?

More likely she was paid for her silence as is standard for Trump. #NDA #SOP

FloridaYankee · 2018-10-21T17:09:54.261Z

Cratic3947:

WuWei:

There should be an investigation.

I think this is another sign Mueller has got nothing… So, they need another investigation.

Nope, this is legitimate evidence that the president’s ability to lead the country is compromised by his own financial greed. He had NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER even voicing an opinion on the matter at hand much less ordering people to handle it a certain way.

sikofit · 2018-10-21T17:13:23.328Z

Corruption is cool!

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T17:27:04.522Z

sikofit:

Call_me_Ishmael:

She clarified. Apparently her lawyers made it up and told her to sign. Who reads the fine print?

More likely she was paid for her silence as is standard for Trump. #NDA #SOP

Is that why Juanita Broadrick changed her story? Or was it out of fear of Clintons that she changed it.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T17:27:37.535Z

FloridaYankee:

Cratic3947:

WuWei:

There should be an investigation.

I think this is another sign Mueller has got nothing… So, they need another investigation.

Nope, this is legitimate evidence that the president’s ability to lead the country is compromised by his own financial greed. He had NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER even voicing an opinion on the matter at hand much less ordering people to handle it a certain way.

you got him THIS time.

sikofit · 2018-10-21T17:30:50.653Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

Is that why Juanita Broadrick changed her story? Or was it out of fear of Clintons that she changed it.

Yes, that is probably why she changed her story as well. I’m not sure why you keep confusing me with someone who defends Bill Clinton’s actions. I think he is about as big of a scumbag as Trump and have said time and time again that I believe both men to be sexual predators

FloridaYankee · 2018-10-21T17:31:48.472Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

FloridaYankee:

Cratic3947:

WuWei:

There should be an investigation.

I think this is another sign Mueller has got nothing… So, they need another investigation.

Nope, this is legitimate evidence that the president’s ability to lead the country is compromised by his own financial greed. He had NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER even voicing an opinion on the matter at hand much less ordering people to handle it a certain way.

you got him THIS time.

I don’t have ■■■■■ I am telling you what you can’t seem to see with your own eyes even though it is right in front of your face. If you think it’s okay then you are approving of corruption at the absolute highest levels of govt.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2018-10-21T17:34:17.311Z

FloridaYankee:

Call_me_Ishmael:

FloridaYankee:

Cratic3947:

WuWei:

There should be an investigation.

I think this is another sign Mueller has got nothing… So, they need another investigation.

Nope, this is legitimate evidence that the president’s ability to lead the country is compromised by his own financial greed. He had NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER even voicing an opinion on the matter at hand much less ordering people to handle it a certain way.

you got him THIS time.

I don’t have ■■■■■ I am telling you what you can’t seem to see with your own eyes even though it is right in front of your face. If you think it’s okay then you are approving of corruption at the absolute highest levels of govt.

Selling access to the state department is corruption. Voicing an opinion is not.

FloridaYankee · 2018-10-21T17:34:43.964Z

sikofit:

Call_me_Ishmael:

Is that why Juanita Broadrick changed her story? Or was it out of fear of Clintons that she changed it.

Yes, that is probably why she changed her story as well. I’m not sure why you keep confusing me with someone who defends Bill Clinton’s actions. I think he is about as big of a scumbag as Trump and have said time and time again that I believe both men to be sexual predators

He does the same thing to me constantly. If I don’t like something Trump did I am automatically branded as being on board with all of the furthest left wing radical agenda imaginable when in actuality, I fall somewhere nearer the center with a strong libertarian bent.

sikofit · 2018-10-21T17:35:53.029Z

FloridaYankee:

I don’t have ■■■■. I am telling you what you can’t seem to see with your own eyes even though it is right in front of your face. If you think it’s okay then you are approving of corruption at the absolute highest levels of govt.

What do you expect when someone’s entire political philosophy boils down to “Democrats are evil, Trump is cool”

FloridaYankee · 2018-10-21T17:36:28.806Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

FloridaYankee:

Call_me_Ishmael:

FloridaYankee:

Cratic3947:

WuWei:

There should be an investigation.

I think this is another sign Mueller has got nothing… So, they need another investigation.

Nope, this is legitimate evidence that the president’s ability to lead the country is compromised by his own financial greed. He had NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER even voicing an opinion on the matter at hand much less ordering people to handle it a certain way.

you got him THIS time.

I don’t have ■■■■■ I am telling you what you can’t seem to see with your own eyes even though it is right in front of your face. If you think it’s okay then you are approving of corruption at the absolute highest levels of govt.

Selling access to the state department is corruption. Voicing an opinion is not.

He ordered people to handle the situation in a manner favorable to his own financial interests, which is much more than voicing an opinion.