I believe there is evidence.
Other vise …why would Piglosi come out a week before election and say very confidently:
[paraphrasing here}: I am positive come January Biden will be coronated President NO MATTER WHAT THE ELECTION NUMBERS SAY.
No matter what the numbers show?
Any brains out there to explain to me what she meant?
She was sure…she spilled the beans till someone slapped her silly and said what are you doing fool…
Never heard her after that.
Oh…he’ll be 25ed in 6 months so the Radicals can take over.

Anyone with good reading comprehension sees that in context, she was talking about poll numbers.
I do agree, Nancy and Mitch as old school with huge amounts of negativity need to go. With a new President moving into the White House, we (the GOP) need to tell Mitch his time is done and the DEMs should tell Nancy the same.
I’d like to see a new President, new Speaker, and new Majority Leader take the help and actually start healing some of the President Trump divide.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS
2 Likes
What does Levin have to do with the two of us thinking about Snuffaluffagus at the same time?
Got to be patient wait and see…what are you afraid off.
All power to you friend.
I do agree we have a lot of fossils in Congress.
They look more like Museum than a governing body. Half are ancient and other half is corrupt.
i don’t trust them yet. this former never trumper is all in for trump.
1 Like
BTW what is wrong with my reading comprehension?
She KNEW before election Biden WILL be President no matter what numbers show?
2 years and a day… if he makes it that long and the dementia doesn’t become severe.
1 Like
He explains WHY you folks shouldn’t keep asking FOR EVIDENCE.
SixFoot
206
If the election fraud is true, it won’t matter to the party of domestic terrorism. Correcting it would involve the necessity of violently suppressing tens of millions of frothing libs in the wake of their destruction.
1 Like
From your own experience.
I like to listen to people who have a law degree. When it comes to law.
JayJay
208
Why paraphrase when we can research exactly what she said?
Unless…of course…one has a Narrative to sell, and needs to paraphrase to make what actually was said sound more ominous.
I feel very confident that Joe Biden will be elected President on Tuesday, whatever the end count is, but on the election that occurs on Tuesday, he will be elected.
Not “no matter what the election numbers say”, but “whatever the end count is”.
A totally different phrase with a totally different meaning.
And of course, even if you want to somehow try and twist this (which you obviously couldn’t, since you used a paraphrase and not what she actually said), she then said this immediately afterwards to remove all doubt:
So, while we don’t want to be overconfident or assume anything, we have to be ready for how we’re going to go down a different path.
https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/102920-1
sikofit
210
Its a bogus argument. If evidence exists then it should be presented
JayJay
211
It means something completely different, actually.
To those of us that learned English and didn’t have the CEC Translation Device implanted into their heads.
Again…he explained why your argument is wrong.
sikofit
213
No he really didn’t. If the evidence exists that massive election fraud occurred then I want it presented and the fraud exposed. Period
You hurt my feelings maybe you’ll be summoned by the Mods.
I was summoned for saying Ill come back in 24 hours to tell why Ginsburg failed terribly.
Talk about Weeklings… some people get hurt easily.