Durham report. I wonder how it will all spin out

[Jezcoe]

@DougBH

He lied.

To who?

[DougBH]

To whomever he told he thought Steele was credible. You brought that up…you tell me.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

[Rurudyne]

And the 3 years before that.

[Jezcoe]

@DougBH

To whomever he told he thought Steele was credible. You brought that up…you tell me.

He could have actually believed that Steele was credible.

[Jezcoe]

@Supreme_War_Pig

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

Yes.

Durham is done and he will give his report and it will make waves in the Right Wing Media while everyone else will laugh at it because he failed to prove his case when he actually had to provide supporting evidence to his claim.

[enki]

@Jezcoe

@Supreme_War_Pig

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

Yes.

Durham is done and he will give his report and it will make waves in the Right Wing Media while everyone else will laugh at it because he failed to prove his case when he actually had to provide supporting evidence to his claim.

And the right wing media will pretend like all the evidence is in plain sight, and continue on as if he proved what they hoped he would. Then he’ll be accused of being a Dem plant.

[CanadianJudo]

so its been how many years and not a single conviction time to wrap this investigation up.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@enki

@Jezcoe

@Supreme_War_Pig

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

Yes.

Durham is done and he will give his report and it will make waves in the Right Wing Media while everyone else will laugh at it because he failed to prove his case when he actually had to provide supporting evidence to his claim.

And the right wing media will pretend like all the evidence is in plain sight, and continue on as if he proved what they hoped he would. Then he’ll be accused of being a Dem plant.

Heh, good point.

[DougBH]

@Jezcoe

@Supreme_War_Pig

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

Yes.

Durham is done and he will give his report and it will make waves in the Right Wing Media while everyone else will laugh at it because he failed to prove his case when he actually had to provide supporting evidence to his claim.

The only legal issue was whether two people lied. That isn’t really the big issue. The bigger issues were that one of the political parties created a fake dossier and used that to undermine an elected administration. Further, a national police force used its power to destroy an administration even though it new the basis for its allegations were a partisan fake dossier.
Both the party and th political party kept truths that would have shown it’s allegations were hoaxes hidden.

I think your scenario is more fitting to the Mueller report, where the chief investigator refused to answer questions about his investigation.

[DougBH]

@Jezcoe

@DougBH

To whomever he told he thought Steele was credible. You brought that up…you tell me.

He could have actually believed that Steele was credible.

Youre putting your trust in the honesty of a man who used a friend as a go between to leak to the media so his leaks couldn’t be traced to himself.

[CanadianJudo]

@DougBH

@Jezcoe

@Supreme_War_Pig

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

Yes.

Durham is done and he will give his report and it will make waves in the Right Wing Media while everyone else will laugh at it because he failed to prove his case when he actually had to provide supporting evidence to his claim.

The only legal issue was whether two people lied. That isn’t really the big issue. The bigger issues were that one of the political parties created a fake dossier and used that to undermine an elected administration. Further, a national police force used its power to destroy an administration even though it new the basis for its allegations were a partisan fake dossier.
Both the party and th political party kept truths that would have shown it’s allegations were hoaxes hidden.

I think your scenario is more fitting to the Mueller report, where the chief investigator refused to answer questions about his investigation.

expect you can’t prove any of that.

[Jezcoe]

@DougBH

@Jezcoe

@Supreme_War_Pig

So Jez, what now? Danchenko is acquitted, is it the end of the road?

Yes.

Durham is done and he will give his report and it will make waves in the Right Wing Media while everyone else will laugh at it because he failed to prove his case when he actually had to provide supporting evidence to his claim.

The only legal issue was whether two people lied. That isn’t really the big issue. The bigger issues were that one of the political parties created a fake dossier and used that to undermine an elected administration. Further, a national police force used its power to destroy an administration even though it new the basis for its allegations were a partisan fake dossier.
Both the party and th political party kept truths that would have shown it’s allegations were hoaxes hidden.

I think your scenario is more fitting to the Mueller report, where the chief investigator refused to answer questions about his investigation.

Dude.

Seriously.

Kill your radio.

Durham failed.

[DougBH]

You are still denying that the dossier was created by a political party and that they kept this hidden?
Or that it was used to undermine a Presidency?
No, I couldn’t prove it to you because you would and apparently are denying the obvious.

[DougBH]

Durham only failed to get a jury to agree that two people lied. That really wasn’t the big issue. How much if any jail time would that have resulted in anyway?

[CanadianJudo]

@DougBH

You are still denying that the dossier was created by a political party and that they kept this hidden?
Or that it was used to undermine a Presidency?
No, I couldn’t prove it to you because you would and apparently are denying the obvious.

I’m asking if you have proof.

[DougBH]

@CanadianJudo

@DougBH

You are still denying that the dossier was created by a political party and that they kept this hidden?
Or that it was used to undermine a Presidency?
No, I couldn’t prove it to you because you would and apparently are denying the obvious.

I’m asking if you have proof.

Do I have proof that the Democrats paid for the dossier for partisan political purposes? No, I was not there when the payments were made. Others have documented this. The founders of a company named Fushion GPS testified to it before congress, as lying about it could be illegal.
Was I in congress when they testified? No. I am basically relying on every newspaper and news article in the country reporting that they did admit the payments before congress.
If you have a separate reality, can you prove it?

[Jezcoe]

@DougBH

Durham only failed to get a jury to agree that two people lied. That really wasn’t the big issue. How much if any jail time would that have resulted in anyway?

It actually is an issue for him because of the two criminal cases that his investigation developed, both of them failed.

That says very bad things about the quality of his work.

[ohknow35]

@Jezcoe

That says very bad things about the quality of his work.

He did go to toothpaste college after all.

[Jezcoe]

@ohknow35

@Jezcoe

That says very bad things about the quality of his work.

He did go to toothpaste college after all.

What does his failure to secure convictions on the two cases that he developed say to you?