1

Judge for yourself it is claimed this may be in his report:

Clinton Lawyer: Jim - It’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss… I’m coming on my own - not on behalf of a client or company - want to help the Bureau. Thanks.

FBI Agent: 200pm at my office?

According to Durham, that’s the meeting when Clinton’s lawyer lied to the FBI, failed to mention he worked for the Clintons, smeared President Trump’s good name, AND set the Russia Hoax in motion!

2

Crossfire Hurricane had already been an open investigation at that point.

3

Go tell someone else what you know. I say you are moving the goalpost to the liberal narrative.

4

You just cannot get a harumph from some sorts.

1 Like
5

It isn’t moving any goalpost.

It is what is true.

Even Durham isn’t claiming that Sussmann’s meeting is what set what you call the “Russian Hoax” into motion.

6

Meanwhile the “Team M” report came out this week and even though it is heavily redacted it paints a clear picture of Manafort, who was the Campaign Manager at the time, working a backdoor deal with Russian Interests to negotiate a peace deal in Ukraine where Eastern Ukraine would be ceded to Russia.

7

Maybe so, but September 19, 2016 was a big, BIG day for the fbi collusion gimps.

1 Like
8

How so?

9

The question is: how not so?

10

because of the other fake information that also came from clinton

2 Likes
11

September 19, 2016

It’s the same day that the fbi crossfire hurricane team of analysts received the dossier and peter strzok was asking “does this get us closer to a fisa?” (although in fairness to the analysts, they never investigated anything in the dossier)

And it just happens to be the same day that sussman walked into the fbi and got the ball rolling on the alpha bank hoax on behalf of his clients.

Just one more incredible coincidence.

2 Likes
12

If Durham fails to get a conviction.

Then what?

13

Why do you keep asking that same question like 40 times thinking you’re making some kind of amazing point??

And i already told you, who cares about sussman??

14

Sussman is the current target of Durham.

If Durham misses … what does that mean for his investigation?

15

41?

42?

More than that??

16

I will abide by a court decision. I am not the judge or jury. You see I abide by the rule of law, unlike some vengeful liberals.

17

Let the courts figure it out.

18

Durham will never convict any dem in a DC court. Predominently dems there.

On the jury it seems several actually donated money to Broom Hillary and one has a daughter on the same soccer team as Sussman. :roll_eyes:

These cases need to be moved some where that the juries aren’t automatically the home team for the dems!

1 Like
19

I love how a potential failure on Durham getting a conviction doesn’t rest on that maybe the indictment was lame to begin with and the Government failed to prosecute it’s case but there is a wider conspiracy working against him.

1 Like
20

There is always a conspiracy at work. Its a staple fall back these days when something does not go their way. There seems to be an inability to accept any decision or result that does not go their way.

1 Like