LOL. Millions of them?

Tens of thousands?

A couple dozen?

All with perfectly forged signatures and valid voter registrations?

Huge conspiracy virtually impossible to keep quiet.

That’s exactly right! Period! :+1:

It’s not a new method of voting.

And any issues with it are actually easier to fix than adding more polling places. Quitting the starving of the postal system would be a good first step.

More polling places means more election workers…and there is currently a shortage of those people.

What’s this? Our portly president’s post office policies personally passed on publicly? The plucky politician’s patron’s promises of prevarication by progressives left powerless by Trump’s proclamation? How will it all turn out? Tune in next week

image

9 Likes

Yes, by increasing it to such a huge degree, it becomes a new method of voting.
The first step is for Democrats to realize that most places have early voting for at least two weeks before the election. Use those two weeks if you are afraid of lines.
This is a made up issue.

Nebraska Football has shown it’s not being increased by such a large degree except in a couple states.

Trump and his supporters are blowing it out of proportion, and Trump is on record of doing things to exacerbate the issue…using his government power.

And you all seem cool with him doing that.

2 Likes

Well, if its not being increased that much, there’s no problem.

If a couple of states want to overuse it, they should have checked with the post office capabilities first.

If the CCP can hold up an election result until after Jan 20, the house that comes in, or if there is none, the senate that comes in gets to appoint their choice of president. Is that democracy?

What is “CCP”?

Chinese Communist Party.

1 Like

I heard HRClinton suggesting people going into voting booths should use their phones to photograph their ballot. Encouraging law-breaking. She did not suggest the same to people voting by mail-out. I don’t wonder why.

Pull your head back in the window citizen… :sunglasses:

Is that against the law?

Link?

Trump is the only one holding up legal action as a possibility. Hell he was calling it rigged even when he won.

" Laws by stateEdit

Most state laws making it a crime to photograph marked ballots were enacted as reform efforts in the early 20th century, as part of a broader campaign that saw the introduction of the secret ballot and the enactment of “other laws intended to prevent voter corruption and intimidation.”[19] Many such laws remain in force even though “the outright buying of votes has receded as a significant issue.”[19]

Jurisdictions that currently prohibit ballot selfies are: Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Illinois’s laws are the strictest of all. While most states with anti-ballot selfie laws make the offense a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, in Illinois, taking a ballot selfie is a felony punishable by 1–3 years in prison.[26][27]"

Well this is interesting. Nancy Pelosi is thinking about bring congress back…not to help American people concerning Covid…but to make sure democrats get to game the voting system.

The USPS isn’t a business.

How much money they lose is moot.

And BTWm the head of the USPS is a major investor in Fedex and UPS. So not only does he and his boss how political motivations for ruining the USPS, he has a financial one as well.

Hooray for republicans using the power of their office to subvert constitutionally mandated services for personal gain!!!

Huh. Wonder if this is true.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theblaze.com/amp/obama-usps-conspiracy-theory-biden-trump-2646999688

No comments? Not even attack the source?