“I happen to agree with it 100%. if you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and … government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and … create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.” --Donald Trump
And this is one of my all-time favorites: “I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida … to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” Trump said.
Asked and answered. I’ll leave it to others to shout TDS at you.
If Trump actually moves forward with any actual wall building on the border, it will be interesting to see how his supporters on the forum find balance between their desire for a wall and the numerous eminent domain issues that will evoke.
Those are her positions on guns, but why is that germane to the two competing visions of corruption. We have plenty of threads where different approaches to redoing gun related deaths have been discussed.
Luo said they went to her website and didn’t find anything about confiscating guns. So I was asking if any of that (stuff that is just as bad and more far reaching) was on her web site.
So people on the right do not think money has too great an influence on political campaigns and don’t care if politicians take lucrative jobs working for industries that were influenced by their votes. Okay, glad we’re clear on that.
Warren lied on her College documents saying she was American Indian, she is morally bankrupt like Hillary and her using a private server as Secretary of State.
Both candidates are speaking of “draining the swamp”. Here’s my question: to what extent is corruption in government a matter of policy – i.e., if we block gun control legislation, restrict abortion and reduce immigration will that address corruption? Or is corruption a matter of politicians putting the accumulation of personal wealth and of campaign contributions ahead of the public good.
Which vision of corruption is more credible?
That’s kind of a convoluted question as worded, IMO, but obviously the latter, which Trump has done nothing but since he came into office.