DOJ creates special unit to target ‘domestic terrorism’

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:02:08.628Z

fallenturtle:

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

And would this even be illegal, “Wife, show me who you are voting for by mail and if it’s not Trump, I want a divorce”?

If you want to make that illegal, if its not, I’m game.

But you know it isn’t. And I doubt it could be constitutionally made illegal. You can’t force someone to stay married.

I was thinking more along the lines of making it illegal to force someone to reveal who they voted for.

No force involved, voluntarily show me or I am out.

Actually I take it all back… she should divorce him because any husband who does that is trash.

Never heard of economic dependence either I see.

Its not worth it. Kick him to the curb. Get welfare.

Exactly who loves democrats enough to go from being well off to welfare? lol. And how many that weren’t even planning to vote will be handed a pre filled mail vote to sign? And why would they be willing to divorce over a vote they weren’t even going to cast.

fallenturtle · 2022-01-13T18:06:31.445Z

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

And would this even be illegal, “Wife, show me who you are voting for by mail and if it’s not Trump, I want a divorce”?

If you want to make that illegal, if its not, I’m game.

But you know it isn’t. And I doubt it could be constitutionally made illegal. You can’t force someone to stay married.

I was thinking more along the lines of making it illegal to force someone to reveal who they voted for.

No force involved, voluntarily show me or I am out.

Actually I take it all back… she should divorce him because any husband who does that is trash.

Never heard of economic dependence either I see.

Its not worth it. Kick him to the curb. Get welfare.

Exactly who loves democrats enough to go from being well off to welfare? lol

This is just turning into a conversation about abusive marriages.

fallenturtle · 2022-01-13T18:07:07.389Z

zantax:

And how many that weren’t even planning to vote will be handed a pre filled mail vote to sign? And why would they be willing to divorce over a vote they weren’t even going to cast.

How do you know they weren’t planning to vote.

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:08:03.353Z

Abusive is your world view, plenty of wives who willingly submit to their husbands decisions. Usually religious in nature.

WuWei · 2022-01-13T18:08:43.061Z

Interesting. It seemed high…

CNN – 13 Jan 22

Intentional killings of law enforcement officers reach 20-year high, FBI says...

Last year saw the highest number of law enforcement officers who were intentionally killed in the line of duty since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, an increase that comes as a rise in gun violence and homicides continues across the country.

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:09:10.744Z

fallenturtle:

zantax:

And how many that weren’t even planning to vote will be handed a pre filled mail vote to sign? And why would they be willing to divorce over a vote they weren’t even going to cast.

How do you know they weren’t planning to vote.

I would assume by the simple method of one spouse asking the other, hey are you going to vote. Don’t even need coercion. No? Mind if I use yours too? Sure honey.

DougBH · 2022-01-13T18:09:53.805Z

Guilds:

Eagle-Keeper:

I never said there is wide spread fraud. I said the validity of mail in ballots cannot be verified.

Sure they can…happens all the time, for decades.

Cons have been conned to believe mail in voting is not secure and safe.

Cons did figure out a long time ago, when more people vote, it hurts their chances of winning.

So, they do…well, what they are doing…try to make it harder to vote, under the guise to protect the integrity of the vote.

It’s bull feces.

Here. Give me your blank signed ballot and I’ll give you twenty dollars for some booze.

Safe and secure.

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:11:56.572Z

DougBH:

Guilds:

Eagle-Keeper:

I never said there is wide spread fraud. I said the validity of mail in ballots cannot be verified.

Sure they can…happens all the time, for decades.

Cons have been conned to believe mail in voting is not secure and safe.

Cons did figure out a long time ago, when more people vote, it hurts their chances of winning.

So, they do…well, what they are doing…try to make it harder to vote, under the guise to protect the integrity of the vote.

It’s bull feces.

Here. Give me your blank signed ballot and I’ll give you twenty dollars for some booze.

Safe and secure.

They think people are such idiots.

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:13:53.750Z

Bad enough my state makes public your party affiliation by assigning it based on which primary you voted in. So that anyone can basically know who you voted for, opening the doors to retaliation.

Guilds · 2022-01-13T18:17:03.168Z

DougBH:

Here. Give me your blank signed ballot and I’ll give you twenty dollars for some booze.

Safe and secure.

Is that really your concern?

Seriously?

Wild…

fallenturtle · 2022-01-13T18:18:43.681Z

zantax:

Abusive is your world view, plenty of wives who willingly submit to their husbands decisions. Usually religious in nature.

I dare not comment on this.

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:20:55.036Z

fallenturtle:

zantax:

Abusive is your world view, plenty of wives who willingly submit to their husbands decisions. Usually religious in nature.

I dare not comment on this.

You do know they exist though right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2018/09/21/what-draws-women-religion-that-says-men-should-be-charge/

zantax · 2022-01-13T18:24:07.607Z

Guilds:

DougBH:

Here. Give me your blank signed ballot and I’ll give you twenty dollars for some booze.

Safe and secure.

Is that really your concern?

Seriously?

Wild…

Oh look an obvious lack of historical knowledge on display. Might want to research voting pre secret ballot US.

fallenturtle · 2022-01-13T18:42:38.520Z

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

And how many that weren’t even planning to vote will be handed a pre filled mail vote to sign? And why would they be willing to divorce over a vote they weren’t even going to cast.

How do you know they weren’t planning to vote.

I would assume by the simple method of one spouse asking the other, hey are you going to vote. Don’t even need coercion. No? Mind if I use yours too? Sure honey.

At that level of cordiality whats stopping him from asking her to vote for his choice when voting in person?

I also don’t think it matters. I don’t really care if someone’s partner who doesn’t care who they vote for chooses to vote for the same person as their partner even if they are voting for someone I don’t want to win. I’ve certainly just matched what my wife has voted for down ballot when I haven’t had a chance to research those offices because I know she and I see eye to eye on most thing political.

Its abuse I’m not cool with.

fallenturtle · 2022-01-13T18:43:56.439Z

DougBH:

Guilds:

Eagle-Keeper:

I never said there is wide spread fraud. I said the validity of mail in ballots cannot be verified.

Sure they can…happens all the time, for decades.

Cons have been conned to believe mail in voting is not secure and safe.

Cons did figure out a long time ago, when more people vote, it hurts their chances of winning.

So, they do…well, what they are doing…try to make it harder to vote, under the guise to protect the integrity of the vote.

It’s bull feces.

Here. Give me your blank signed ballot and I’ll give you twenty dollars for some booze.

Safe and secure.

Go vote for this person at the polls and I’ll give you twenty dollars for some booze.

Safe and secure.

fallenturtle · 2022-01-13T18:45:31.561Z

zantax:

fallenturtle:

zantax:

Abusive is your world view, plenty of wives who willingly submit to their husbands decisions. Usually religious in nature.

I dare not comment on this.

You do know they exist though right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2018/09/21/what-draws-women-religion-that-says-men-should-be-charge/

No comment. If you want more info you can PM me.

Smyrna · 2022-01-13T18:51:03.766Z

Guilds:

Thank you for your opinion.

You are wrong.

Again.

I know…and since you’re so smart, name here in Hannity Land your example of something involving as many people as voting, that’s fraud free?

I’m sorry to break this to you cuz obviously, you have a good heart but where $ and power are concerned, fraud is also a huge concern. There fore systems must be put in place that negate this opportunity or absolutely minimize it.

Guntsu · 2022-01-13T18:54:56.468Z

The Ninjas looked into this via the “audit” in AZ it was sloppy and full of errors but they did confirm Biden won and now the Ninjas have disappeared into the wind.

The imaginings of fraud on a grand scaled are just that fantasy

Smyrna · 2022-01-13T18:57:24.481Z

Guntsu:

The Ninjas looked into this via the “audit” in AZ they it was sloppy and full of errors but they did confirm Biden won and now the Ninjas have disappeared into the wind.

The imaginings of fraud on a grand scaled are just that fantasy

There was no “imaginings” regarding the 6,000 votes that were flipped by a Dominion voting machine from Trump to Biden. There was no imagining the cameras capturing the observers in the Fulton County arena being sent home and counting resuming before they were even in their cars. What I don’t understand is why anyone, would be against insuring the integrity of our election process? It doesn’t make any sense?

Supreme_War_Pig · 2022-01-13T19:00:29.284Z

WuWei:

Cesar doesn’t count, he’s conservative.

You picked up the ball and ran with it. You act like it can’t happen, which I find interesting.

I am sure Caesar will be surprised to hear that.