Does the Mueller report open with a lie?

Democrats were pushing this dossier for months. It tied everyone of their conspiracies together and justified the investigaton.
When it started to become obvious that it was junk, it all turned to “dossier, what dossier? That’s only something Republicans talk about”.
But for the final determination, that is coming out with the DOJ investigation. As I was told about a year ago…be patient. They need all the time necessary to do their job.

Read the OP. Rush read it. He doesn’t buy it.

Personally, I’m waiting for the DOJ investigation of what went on.

Rush said it. I believe it. That settles it.

4 Likes

NO

The dossier was ALL Christopher Steele. No Republican was anywhere near it.

A Republican hired Fusion GPS to do opposition research on Trump but he was OUT of it all, long before they were eventually picked up by the Clinton campaign / DNC and they then commissioned Steele to dig up his stuff, based on their belief that he was connected in Russia. .

M

It took 8 congressional investigations of Benghazi and you never believed those.

How many DOJ investigations will it take until you believe them. :lying_face:

2 Likes

Wrong.

The Benghazi investigations went on and on because the Obama WH kept STONE-WALLING on the information that the Congress was asking for, often invoking executive privilege, and when they finally released it, under court order, that panel which had asked for it had already concluded and a new panel had to start, so that happened 8 times, as information kept dribbling in. That is ALL on the Obama administration - not the Congress.

This is COMPLETELY the reverse of what the Trump administration did with Mueller - giving him everything he asked for, including millions of documents and any witness he wanted and never once invoking executive privilege for the entire time Mueller was in operation - virtually FULL transparency.

But we kept learning NEW things about Benghazi with each new panel. For instance, it was the last one that revealed emails that proved the Obama administration KNEW it was a terrorist attack on the night of the attack, and not the LIE they told us, about a protest getting out of control.

It was also the last one that revealed Clinton had been using a private server for her government emails.

So, don’t tell me it was a waste of time to keep after them.

M

We did learn one thing from Benghazi. Investigations are good for elections.

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.”
Kevin McCarthy

5 Likes

In the end, wingers were still mad as hell with the result and wanted her locked up.

They were never satisfied with the result and wanted MORE.

1 Like

NO.

Benghazi wasn’t about a law being broken. It was about gross incompetence and subsequent malfeasance by the administration.

It was about the administration LYING to the public and eventually to all the world about the deaths of four Americans for political reasons. Obama likes to pretend there were no scandals in his administration, but this was a major one. People DIED because of gross incompetence that they attempted to cover up.

That last panel did completely expose that the administration lied to everyone and covered up and it also revealed that Clinton broke laws with her email stuff, but that wasn’t the reason Benghazi was investigated. It was just a result of the investigation.

M

When someone who wants to be president is THAT incompetent it needs to be exposed. She not only failed at her job but she then engaged in a conspiracy to cover it up.

Only the Benghazi probes would have revealed that, and they did. Don’t blame the probes for exposing the truth.

M

Does that justify a witch hunt?

How is it a witch hunt to reveal what Benghazi truly was - not what the administration TOLD everyone it was???

You just don’t like what was revealed.

The truth is the truth. Deal with it.

M

What was revealed?

I suggest you remember that as the Mueller Report progresses. :wink:

1 Like

Truth isn’t truth.

1 Like

I’m waiting for this “special counsel” and Mueller, and the rest of the Democrat Politicians to pay back the American tax payers all of the time and money, and effort spent on this witch hunt!

Unfortunately this is where the mistake was made.

Rush is a Trump supporter. His job is to spin the news to discredit anything that may be bad for Trump.

As its been stated ever since the report came out. Please read it.

1 Like

Exactly. But regardless of which party started it, they were never trumpers, political opposition regardless of party. FISAgate was a bipartisan nevertrumper activity that used federal resources and federal employees and deception to try to stop a candidate.

Which was a shorthand way of saying

What people call truth is not truth if it isn’t true.

But libs prefer to pretend it was a stupid statement.

Rush himself has a term for this, “dittohead”
HE knows that people are going to take what he says as gospel and none of them are going to refute. Reading be damned! Facts be damned! HONESTY be damned!

5 Likes