Well that can’t be true. I have been assured…repeatedly that won’t happen.

1 Like

Can’t wait to see that go to the courts.

Idaho argues that it is within a State’s rights to force a woman to die from a non-viable pregnancy.

That’s about it.

If you choose what they would in a given situation, they’re all for it, but if you want something else, um

Don’t you realize how likely you are to get addicted?

Don’t you realize how risky having that baby will be for you, or how imperfect it will be?

Don’t you realize how offensive your idea will be perceived?

Or how choosing to abide by the tenets of your faith violates the rights of others?

Pro choice is a misnomer.

1 Like

“Idaho argues”?

This was the party’s summer meeting to discuss party platform etc. It does not make law.

The law as it is will stay the same. What you do not understand is that quite a few of the “Republicans” in the House and Senate in ID are not conservative and are more like Romney. You will never have to worry about a total ban as the ID Legislature if full of RINO’s.

Heck, they won’t even vote to put an end to illegals i the workforce. Too many fat cat farmers and ag people are Representatives etc and need the labor. This is why Northern Idaho hates Southern Idaho.

Yeah, they have no idea how it works at the Summer and Fall meetings of the Party. I, however, do know as I have been there many times as a delegate and alternate.

2 Likes

Don’t worry, I’m sure you’ll win back a majority of the populace on this whole pesky eighty percent of the country not in favor of it once police homicide squads have to start criminally investigating miscarriages. Americans love cops all up in their business.

Noted.

Idaho v Whoever Brings Idaho to Court For Banning Abortion in All Cases.

“Idaho argues”

image

2 Likes

It has to be enacted as law before it can be challenged and argued in Court.

2 Likes

And it won’t. I would be totally surprised if that ever happened. The exception bill you have now will probably stay as law and not change.

1 Like

“Some women are even going further, taking the drastic step of avoiding sex altogether outside the bonds of marriage. “I can’t believe it has come to this point, but I may have to start being responsible with my body and relationships,” said another concerned woman.“

6 Likes

It sure would help if people understood these little details before hyperventilating about things they know not of, in lands they live not in. :wink:

4 Likes

Were they using it properly?

Or did they miss pills? Or not tell a new doctor they were taking medication? Or maybe use oil based lubricants with a condom, or just plain old not tell sperminator dude they were going off bc when they unilaterally made a try for a or another baby?

Reasons for ineffective pre-pregnancy contraception use in patients seeking abortion services - PMC.

Caucasian dominated feminism really has taken the dignity of womanhood and reduced many women to irresponsible, more child like beings.

1 Like

Oh my, having to stop at 7 Eleven and buy a few three packs before doing the deed. :fearful::scream::face_in_clouds::cold_face:. What’s the world coming to?

Hey, maybe I’ll see the diagnosis “high risk heterosexual (or homosexual) behavior” less frequently. That would be something good.

Say, a little off topic, but do you remember the DC Women’s March? I’m less embarrassed to admit I know men who have served prison time than I am to admit two female cousins marched.

One now has a 20-something son whose a kept man, and they “want him to get a graduate degree in something marketable”, and that’s total bs as this kid is outgoing and speaks several languages, could easily fit in with a real estate license or doing travel agency work, but that’s the sort of woman who marched in DC, the sort who have reduced women to irresponsible and dependent on abortion to clean up their little messes and reducing men to childlike, marginally employed human beings

Anyway, were I POTUS, they’d be marching on DC again—to get Trump back. I’d sign away so many laws specifically for women Trump would look like amateur hour.

Nope, you get no Unaffordable Care Act.

No Breast Cancer Reconstruction Act, either. You want post mastectomy implants, you pay at least part of the costs.

No more Federal Medicaid Program to cover breast and cervical cancer treatment. I thought Medicaid was insurance for the indigent. Why do we need programs this specific?

Those jobs that had physical fitness requirements of being able to lift the average size adult will again have them. You meet that requirement, the job’s yours. If not, go lift weights in a gym and come back.

No more adding points to exams for female and minority test takers. No more endless alimony or child support while denying visitation.

No more special treatment. No more abortion rights.

White feminists didn’t want equitable treatment. They want special treatment, and I’d sign it away with one EO after another.

■■■■ ‘em!

1 Like

when you run you’d get my vote!

2 Likes

thinkingman for Vice President !

If some employee is, let’s say somewhere in New England, and wants an orthopedic procedure that will make them more comfortable with the results of an injury, but the procedure they have in mind is experimental and offered only in Scripps Hospital in San Diego, would some of these woke do gooder companies offer to pay for transit and housing for the employee and family?

No, probably not. This is all about cleaning up after women who are too mother ■■■■■■■ stupid to properly practice non permanent birth control and too ■■■■■■■ lazy to use that bc coverage to get a bilateral tubal ligation.

Coverage for a procedure and transit to leave town if you want to improve your life and not hurt or kill anyone else, no can do, but abortion?! Health insurance and woke companies are both a big, fat, unfunny joke.

■■■■ so called women’s rights.

■■■■ so called women’s health.

■■■■ expressions like “You go girl”, and the namby pamby, feminized men too lazy and/or too stupid to practice abstinence, condom usage or use that insurance coverage to get a vasectomy. They’re so entitlement minded they probably wouldn’t even wait until the Post Vasectomy Sperm Count is at zero before unprotected ■■■■■■■■ then the rest of us would have to hear them whine about how “there were only a few left.”:sob:

Tired of being expected to clean up the messes of imbeciles.

Ass clowns think they’re doing good by helping women get rid of unwanted babies.

My long time former bf is retirement age. He & his fiancée decided to abort their baby.

Their relationship subsequently ended. “Dan” not only never got over it, he longed for at least one child and would tell me had he not done that, they’d have a grown child.

We were temperamentally incompatible & I was in young and dumb phase, so I made sure to not have any babies with him before the relationship ended, just non permanent bc.

It didn’t appear he was doing so well last I checked. Most human beings with a conscience don’t just get over that and move on with their lives.

■■■■■■■ pro “choice” ■■■■■■■■■ we’ve let those worse than the lunatics—only a few of them lack a conscience—run the whole damned asylum.

1 Like