What? That makes no sense at all. Of course there are fewer “people charged” when you take away the leading detection devices. You would have to stick a cop at every place a camera used to be to have the same numbers.
Call_me_Ishmael: biggestal99:Crime went down even further under the “no stop and frisk” policy.
I’ve read that when the cops remove those “red light cameras” the number of people charged with running a red light decreases. I guess people just naturally obey the law more when no one is checking.
What? That makes no sense at all. Of course there are fewer “people charged” when you take away the leading detection devices. You would have to stick a cop at every place a camera used to be to have the same numbers.
thank you.
Pretty much this.
Are you saying that violent crimes went down because fewer people were reporting their victimization after stop and frisk?
Because if that’s what you’re implying, then you fundamentally don’t understand reality.
What liberal mayor?
I remember when that show was in wondering why anyone would want to live in Cabot Cove.
That sleepy little town had to have the highest per capital murder rate in the country.
Or Midsomer in England - they sure do have a high body count for being in the sleepy countryside.