Do you libs really believe this

What? That makes no sense at all. Of course there are fewer “people charged” when you take away the leading detection devices. You would have to stick a cop at every place a camera used to be to have the same numbers.

thank you.

Pretty much this.

Are you saying that violent crimes went down because fewer people were reporting their victimization after stop and frisk?

Because if that’s what you’re implying, then you fundamentally don’t understand reality.

What liberal mayor?

Or Midsomer in England - they sure do have a high body count for being in the sleepy countryside.