DNC moves to change debate rules to exclude Tulsi Gabbard

[hwyflier]

@7ranz

That’s the point. The DNC is perfectly fine changing their rules to help someone try to buy the election.

Your point sucks. Bloomberg didn’t buy the election. Note Bernie and Biden remaining. No Bloomberg.

@7ranz

However, the candidate who actually tried to win votes with their message, whatever you think about it, is excluded because the DNC have now changed the rules once she got a delegate.

No she’s excluded because no one voted for her and she has no chance, not even a fantastical one, of becoming the nominee. She had her shot. She was in plenty of debates. She lost. The end.

[7ranz]

@hwyflier

@7ranz

That’s the point. The DNC is perfectly fine changing their rules to help someone try to buy the election.

Your point sucks. Bloomberg didn’t buy the election. Note Bernie and Biden remaining. No Bloomberg.

@7ranz

However, the candidate who actually tried to win votes with their message, whatever you think about it, is excluded because the DNC have now changed the rules once she got a delegate.

No she’s excluded because no one voted for her and she has no chance, not even a fantastical one, of becoming the nominee. She had her shot. She was in plenty of debates. She lost. The end.

The keyword in my statement there is “try.” Just because Bloomberg failed miserably doesn’t change what the DNC did.

I already agreed she isn’t winning.

[hwyflier]

@7ranz

The keyword in my statement there is “try.” Just because Bloomberg failed miserably doesn’t change what the DNC did.

I already agreed she isn’t winning.

So what are you on about then? Fairness? She had more debates than Bloomberg. Hell, she was on more ballots.

On top of all the obvious reasons why she’s out, she’s made clear she’d rather raise hell to up her own profile than advance the party’s cause. Meanwhile, Bloomberg is spending a billion to advance the cause.

[altair1013]

@AngraMainyu

Her attacks are vicious. If Biden can’t handle it, well…

She’s bright and patriotic. She would have been incredibly formidable had the dems given her half a chance.

[hwyflier]

@altair1013

She’s bright and patriotic. She would have been incredibly formidable had the dems given her half a chance.

She had her chance. She lost. What’s so difficult about that?

She should have went the Palin route. That’s how a party gives someone a chance

[altair1013]

@hwyflier

She had her chance. She lost. What’s so difficult about that?

Nothing is difficult about it at all. It’s obvious. The dems have a problem with strong women.

[hwyflier]

@altair1013

Nothing is difficult about it at all. It’s obvious. The dems have a problem with strong women.

Sure.

[Samson_Corwell]

@Munimula1

@AngraMainyu

True. Hence, any wild cards like Tulsi are more than welcome.

Only by Republicans. To us, she is a joke.

Why?

[7ranz]

@hwyflier

So what are you on about then? Fairness?

I’m criticizing the DNC for changing their debate rules to let Bloomberg in and Tulsi out. I’m stating the DNC will make room on the debate for a racist billionaire oligarch who wants to just buy his way to the White House without actually going out himself to run a campaign himself and convince voters based on his positions.

The DNC is more comfortable changing the rules to let Bloomberg in then they are just leaving the rules as is to let Tulsi on the stage.

I agree the party is acting in their interests. I’m just pointing out that Bloomberg is more in line with their interests than Tulsi is.

She had more debates than Bloomberg. Hell, she was on more ballots.

Yes, that’s because she ran a presidential campaign from the start. Bloomberg wasn’t at those debates or on more ballots because he wasn’t doing any of the work to get on those stages or ballots.

On top of all the obvious reasons why she’s out, she’s made clear she’d rather raise hell to up her own profile than advance the party’s cause. Meanwhile, Bloomberg is spending a billion to advance the cause.

What cause is Bloomberg fighting for? Besides not wanted to pay higher taxes. Let us not forget he did not just throw a ■■■■ fit about Bernie, but has done the same for Warren in the past as well. His only cause is to stop the left segment of the Democratic Party from winning the Executive.

[altair1013]

@altair1013

@altair1013

Nothing is difficult about it at all. It’s obvious. The dems have a problem with strong women.

Sure.

I have heard this from democratic women. You are probably going to hear more of it. Enjoy!

[conan]

Might as well hang a sign that says “socialist not wanted” “Woman not wanted” on DNC door.

[conan]

Tulsi came on FOX few times…it’s why she isn’t wanted in DNC.

[FlameHeart]

But as some posters proved above, other democratic candidates went on Fox. Why are they discriminating against her??

[Jezcoe]

@FlameHeart

But as some posters proved above, other democratic candidates went on Fox. Why are they discriminating against her??

She has zero path to the nomination.

That is why.

[FlameHeart]

I understand that, but didn’t they cause her to go down in the first place? I know a lot of Libertarains supported her; I wonder what happened to that? Gosh I must sound uninformed.

[hwyflier]

@7ranz

I’m criticizing the DNC for changing their debate rules to let Bloomberg in and Tulsi out. I’m stating the DNC will make room on the debate for a racist billionaire oligarch who wants to just buy his way to the White House without actually going out himself to run a campaign himself and convince voters based on his positions.

But he’s not running for president anymore. So, now he’s just a guy who has nothing to be mad at and a billion dollars promised to help the cause.

@7ranz

The DNC is more comfortable changing the rules to let Bloomberg in then they are just leaving the rules as is to let Tulsi on the stage.

It’s not really a conspiracy though. It’s prudent. Even you agree she has no chance in hell.

@7ranz

What cause is Bloomberg fighting for?

Not Chapo Trap House’s, that’s for sure.

[hwyflier]

@FlameHeart

but didn’t they cause her to go down in the first place?

No. Sometimes, candidates don’t gain traction. She is one of them. Not everyone gets to be president.

@FlameHeart

I know a lot of Libertarains supported her;

That’s sort of a problem when you’re running on the democratic party ticket

[hwyflier]

Is this your complicated way of saying you voted for Hillary?

[gooddad409]

@altair1013

@AngraMainyu

Her attacks are vicious. If Biden can’t handle it, well…

She’s bright and patriotic. She would have been incredibly formidable had the dems given her half a chance.

That’s why it’s not happening. They(DNC) don’t want her in there against the mentally failing Biden.

[Jezcoe]

@FlameHeart

I understand that, but didn’t they cause her to go down in the first place? I know a lot of Libertarains supported her; I wonder what happened to that? Gosh I must sound uninformed.

Are there a ton of Libertarians voting in the Democratic Primaries?

That is where you might find your answer.