Ugh vetting.
And democrats want to allow, for example, the entire caravan coming in to be granted amnesty since they’re all just looking for better lives, are oppressed, are all just women and children, have no ties to gangs or crime…
Why bother getting?
To what degree can you “vet”?
Mountain_Soldier:And democrats want to allow, for example, the entire caravan coming in to be granted amnesty since they’re all just looking for better lives, are oppressed, are all just women and children, have no ties to gangs or crime…
Why bother getting?
To what degree can you “vet”?
So just give everyone the benefit of the doubt and let them in, right?
States are not charged to enforce federal law
Allan
I think the wall is a stupid waste of money, but this is where the left looses me. Kidnapping is a federal crime too and if a San Francisco cop comes across a kidnapper and his victim from another state, should he just say, Hey have a nice day?
So just give everyone the benefit of the doubt and let them in, right?
No. I’m asking to what degree we are capable of vetting immigrants. I’m not saying we should not in any form.
Mountain_Soldier:So just give everyone the benefit of the doubt and let them in, right?
No. I’m asking to what degree we are capable of vetting immigrants. I’m not saying we should not in any form.
I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
I think the wall is a stupid waste of money, but this is where the left looses me. Kidnapping is a federal crime too and if a San Francisco cop comes across a kidnapper and his victim from another state, should he just say, Hey have a nice day?
Absolutely not, they hold the kidnapper for up to 96 hours while an arrest warrant is issued. Once the arrest warrant is issued, you can be held by a city/county/state or in a federal facility.
ImRightYoureWrong: Mountain_Soldier:So just give everyone the benefit of the doubt and let them in, right?
No. I’m asking to what degree we are capable of vetting immigrants. I’m not saying we should not in any form.
I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
Since you don’t seem to know what or how vetting occurs…
I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
Maybe we could have an immigration hearing and let an administrative judge make the determination… Oh, that’s how it actually works today…
Mountain_Soldier:I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
Maybe we could have an immigration hearing and let an administrative judge make the determination… Oh, that’s how it actually works today…
With attorneys provided by us?
And if you imagine 5,700 of these stadiums, that’s the US population.
So those granted asylum equal 1/5,700th of the US population.
And the “caravan invasion” @Mountain_Soldier referred to is 100 times smaller…so we should be trembling at an “invasion force” that is 1/570,000th the size of the US population.
I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
I’m not convinced the current policy is let then all in and take them at the word. As an aside, it is notable that many look at immigration through the eyes of fear.
And if you imagine 5,700 of these stadiums, that’s the US population.
So those granted asylum equal 1/5,700th of the US population.
And the “caravan invasion” @Mountain_Soldier referred to is 100 times smaller…so we should be trembling at an “invasion force” that is 1/570,000th the size of the US population.
My point wasn’t the fact of one caravan, it’s the continual stream of people coming here illegally.
With attorneys provided by us?
Sigh… Asylum seekers have to pay for their own representation, the taxpayers do not pay for asylum seekers representation…
Mountain_Soldier:I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
I’m not convinced the current policy is let then all in and take them at the word. As an aside, it is notable that many look at immigration through the eyes of fear.
It seems many of those on the left want the number greatly increased and requirements for entry to be relaxed.
Absolutely not, they hold the kidnapper for up to 96 hours while an arrest warrant is issued. Once the arrest warrant is issued, you can be held by a city/county/state or in a federal facility.
Do they notify other jurisdictions that the kidnapper was caught? Are San Francisco cops required to notify ICE when they come in contact with someone who is here illegally?
It seems many of those on the left want the number greatly increased and requirements for entry to be relaxed.
That’s pretty vague…
ImRightYoureWrong: Mountain_Soldier:I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
I’m not convinced the current policy is let then all in and take them at the word. As an aside, it is notable that many look at immigration through the eyes of fear.
It seems many of those on the left want the number greatly increased and requirements for entry to be relaxed.
It seems you are making things up.
Just an easy question. I’ve lived under, (I guess would be the correct word), eleven Presidents. I know there are probably many out there who have been around longer than myself but I’m just curious. Did you ever think taxpayer funded mouthpieces would be fighting for the rights of Foreigners over The Rights of American Citizens? How could WE, and I do mean WE allow things to get here? Some people are offended by my use of the term WE allowed but correct me if I’m wrong, this is OUR country, period. What happens here is OUR responsibility. The majority of Citizens just sit around and watch the Media and those in government try and destroy OUR President. We watch our Congressional leaders put Foreigner’s Rights and ILLEGAL ALIEN’s Rights above OUR own. Did you ever think YOU would allow this to happen in America? Well my friends. You, me and millions of others are doing just that. I guess the question should be this. What are WE going to do about it?
No…I never did but…I’m now waking up to it, pulling my resources from where they’ve previously been allocated and redirecting them towards correcting this problem. I’m with you my friend and thanks for this post.
Mountain_Soldier: ImRightYoureWrong: Mountain_Soldier:I’m not an investigator so I’m not sure how much we can. Seems rather foolish to just take everyone at their word or massively expand the number of people allowed to just come on in.
I’m not convinced the current policy is let then all in and take them at the word. As an aside, it is notable that many look at immigration through the eyes of fear.
It seems many of those on the left want the number greatly increased and requirements for entry to be relaxed.
It seems you are making things up.
Not at all. Why all the partisan fighting if the left wants increased border security and requirements tightened? They don’t.
They respond with an emotional argument that the people coming here are all just looking for better lives and we need to be more compassionate and understanding.