Did the CIA hack the DNC server in a false-flag operation?

Bill Binney, former NSA official and whistleblower, presented his evidence that files from the DNC hack that launched the Russia-collusion conspiracy theory and resulted in the multi-year Mueller investigation came from a CIA false-flag operation. Here is a brief summary of his information:

  1. The time stamps for the Wikileaks files show a file transfer rate that exceeds what is possible over the internet, which means that the hack could not have been done overseas. The hack was most likely a download to a thumb drive or similar device from a local network.

  2. Russian signature stamps appear to be inserted into the data, which implies a deliberate attempt to blame Russia.

  3. Time stamps are consistent with work being done inside the US, mainly in the Eastern time zone.

  4. Binney offered to present the information to major news organizations, but all have refused the offer. He is also trying to submit the information into court proceedings but has been unsuccessful.

Here is a transcript and a link to the video of the statement:

In my opinion, the evidence clearly shows that Russia was not the source of the hack, and the CIA or some other intelligence agency is a likely source for the apparent false flag. While the evidence makes sense, so does the reluctance of news organizations to air allegations against the CIA. As Chuck Schumer said in January 2017:

Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you . . .Look at the Russian hacking, without the intelligence community we would never have discovered it.

The real question for the upcoming election:
Should the surveillance agencies run the elected government or should the elected government run the surveillance agencies?


…drip, drip, drip…

So what they need to do is find a CIA agent or employee who was in the central time zone and western time zone and eastern time zone, all three, at the exact times of the time stamps. If there are none, it’s either a wider conspiracy or it was not the CIA.

I think that Binney’s evidence clearly shows that the hack did not come from Russia or other location overseas. Circumstantial evidence would point to an agent working within the DNC and providing the files to the CIA or another intelligence agency.

I suspect that Binney may have some inside knowledge that points more conclusively towards the CIA as the source of the hack, but he is not sharing it in public. The fact that the DNC refused FBI requests to examine the servers that were hacked points toward the DNC having at least some knowledge of the nature of the operation.

1 Like

Is “government of the CIA, by the CIA, and for the CIA” Biden’s unstated platform?

Well, the servers were downloaded and examined by the FBI. These are interesting statements from Binney though.

Not likely Biden would have known anything about this alleged operation at the time.

When the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the State Department, the DoJ all unite for political purposes to deceitfully and illegally promote one party over another, “we” are in serious trouble. All of us should be thankful Hillary lost and Barr became the AG to expose and prosecute those involved in this.

1 Like

Why would the CIA hack a campaign and then give that material to the Russians to disseminate?


Evidence shows that Biden supported the Russia-collusion investigation while still in the White House in January 2017:

The Obama White House was intimately involved in the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign, which came immediately after the release of the DNC information on Wikileaks:

By July 31, 2016, they note, “the FBI had formally opened a counterintelligence investigation into the Trump’s campaign’s ties to Russians, with sub-inquiries targeting four individuals” — Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Carter Page and George Papadopoulos

And Biden’s adviser, Colin Kahl, was present in meetings related the surveillance of the Trump campaign:

Rice would chair the principals’ meetings — which brought together Brennan, Comey, Kerry, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and General Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — with only a few other White House officials present, including White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco, and Colin Kahl, Vice President Joe Biden’s national security adviser. (Kahl had to insist to Rice that he be allowed to attend so Biden could be kept up to speed.)

Whether Biden had actual knowledge that Russian hack story was really a hoax is not clear, but he certainly did not to question its true origin nor did he object using it a pretext to spy on political opponents.

Given Biden’s clearly limited mental capacities, would he be able to prevent further CIA interference the government and elections?

Clearly you are unaware how DEEP the DEEP STATE is.

The DNC would not allow the FBI to examine their server, it was examined by a private company called Crowdstrike who submitted their report to the FBI!

They got EXACT copies of the servers, it’s EXACTLY the same thing.


Stick to the domestic download angle, it’s far more interesting.

Every 3 months. Like clockwork. Groundhogs Day!

1 Like

You think Binney knows where in Ukraine CrowdStrike stashed the real server?

The cover story had to look good, don’t you see?

Well well well. The so called “CIA hack” theory was shot down several years ago.

This theory assumes that the hacker downloaded the files to a computer and then leaked it from that computer,” said Rich Barger, director of security research at Splunk.

But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.

People should stop posting what they don’t understand.

What this “NSA Whistleblower” failed to account for in his “evidence” is that he is working with files that a hacker already touched. He doesn’t have the original data that the FBI has. How can this be proof of anything 2 or 3 times removed from the source.

Also, let’s assume he is correct about the time stamps and they had to be downloaded locally. See my above criticism? He did not rule out Guccifer downloading the information to his device and storing that information on a thumb drive for safe keeping. If his “fat table time stamp” is accurate (FAT has a data storage limit and he didn’t say what the size of each download was or if it was FAT16 or 32)… then a much easier explanation is that it was Guccifers downloading off his device that caused the “rounding up”.

I don’t need to go much further than that. I can see why nobody wants to listen to him. He doesn’t know what he is talking about.


I find it hilarious that posters here who actually work in the Industry has explained this over and over why the conspiracy theories are wrong and it just goes in one ear and out the other.