enki
21
Can I get in on this too?
What makes you think he wont?
We should start a pool on what the excuse from the conspiracy theorists will when the 5th comes and goes with nary a whimper.
enki
25
It’ll be proof that the conspiracy goes much deeper than we ever thought.
1 Like
Why I think he won’t, is because the Uranium One conspiracy theories are borderline retarded. They literally make no sense with 5 minutes of factual reading. You gotta be numb from the ■■■■■■■ in both directions to buy into any of that gibberish.
I don’t care, we all know Mueller was the FBI and Rosenstein was the DOJ that buried the Uranium One candle.
enki
28
And what will it mean if he isn’t indicted?
That is the thing about this: with many rightwing pseudo-conspira-scandals, I can see the plot, get the themes, play the believing game, connect some dots. With Uranium one, the dots lead nowhere; some aren’t even dots. The plot holes are fatiguing and dumb. No effort has been put into it: it’s incoherent. I can’t even be bothered to suspend my disbelief for it.
Sure, now answer my question or forget about it.
So when the 6th comes and Mueller is not indicted, then you lose?
This is a suckers bet, you don’t have to leave. When the 6th comes and Mueller is not indicted, you have to agree to listen to why Uranium One is too stupid to even make a conspiracy theory out of.
It’s funny how people work overtime to discredit the facts.
It’s fascinating and scary at the same time. It’s also amazing how many people we know buy so easily into conspiracy theories. I’ve been doing a lot of reading and watching one well known poster on here devolve into a conspiracy theorist. Just makes you wonder what is up with people’s psyche that leads them to this type of thing.
4 Likes
It’s definitely made me a lot less naive, and a lot less optimistic and confident about the Enlightenment and all that. I knew we were a fragile, limited species, prone to bias, fallacy, cognitive distortions, tribalism, highjacked amygdalas, etc., but . . . Jeebus. When you shake it up with Dunning-Kruger and every other toxic quality and condition, it’s bad, bad news.
So when this doesn’t go anywhere, how are you going to reconcile your understanding of “facts” with reality? This is the fascinating part for me.
The reality is they have facts to prove it!
OK. So when that doesn’t happen, how will you rationalize it and explain it away?