…but “we” know one thing for sure, this “violence” and those involved will be treated much different than those of January 6th.
…yep.
I disagree.
rhetoric is rhetoric.
why does dhs consider any rhetoric that goes against the left inciting, yet the same left wing rhetoric is just rhetoric?
no worries, it will all be mostly peaceful, perhaps a bit firey
JayJay:Of course politicians are going to politic.
JayJay:I did nothing of the sort.
K…
That wasn’t “politic”, it was inciting violence against SCOTUS Justices…period.
That’s not who I was referring to.
Now…your opinion on the subject, please?
Is use of extreme rhetoric extremist? Yes or no.
Has there been any violence outside the justices’ houses?
Of course verbal extremism is extremism. People are allowed to be extreme, and the government has to live with that under the first amendment. Violent, illegal actions in furtherance of that extremism is not permissible.
Has there been any violence outside the justices’ houses?
There doesn’t need to be overt violence for them to be threatened and intimidated. What a garbage dodge.
Has there been any violence outside the justices’ houses?
…and there ya are again, defending this…just like I said.
you seem confused, the thread is not about my opinion, its about the dhs having two different opinions. one for conservatives and one for leftists.
what is your opinion of dhs having different standards based on political leanings?