Back to the MOTTE!
JayJay: WuWei: JayJay:There’s no absurdity here.
You’re making an emotional argument, not a rational one.
When a cop sells drugs or commits murder, is it the same when a plumber does?
The crime?
Yes it is.
It’s exactly the same.
Back to the MOTTE!
Not in the slightest.
You’ve made a false assumption here.
Numerous ones, in fact.
I even predicted someone would.
Not in the slightest.
Definitely.
STODR: WuWei: STODR:OK you answer it. What are they grooming them for?
The new Proletariat. Crit.
That’s what Critical Theory does, it’s a crit factory.
I highly doubt that that a bunch of pedophiles are grooming a new working class. Even if they were you think that is what Purple was referring too?
No. @PurpnGold and his ilk attempt to limit “grooming” to the least prevalent definition they can find so as to argue against it. It’s a kafkatrap.
I’m using the conservative application of grooming in this thread. You can crit this or crit that all you want. Groomer/Pedo has picked up steam due to opposition to the conservative crusade against lgbtq.
Groomer has never been associated with professors teaching CRT. At least not in the context of pedophilia
JayJay:Not in the slightest.
Definitely.
Nope…simply numerous false assumptions on your part.
As I predicted would happen.
Groomer has never been associated with professors teaching CRT.
It is the objective of the whole thing with doing it in schools.
And it goes back to reconstruction.
PurpnGold:Groomer has never been associated with professors teaching CRT.
It is the objective of the whole thing with doing it in schools.
And it goes back to reconstruction.
Pedophilia?
WuWei: JayJay:Not in the slightest.
Definitely.
Nope…simply numerous false assumptions on your part.
As I predicted would happen.
It is not an assumption that crits are pushing Critical Pedagogy into the US public education system to create a new proletariat and have been for decades.
Grooming is not limited to pedophilia.
Grooming is not limited to pedophilia.
In the context of this thread… it is. Groomer and pedo are interchangeable when it comes to teaching about lgbtq to k-12
JayJay: WuWei: JayJay:Not in the slightest.
Definitely.
Nope…simply numerous false assumptions on your part.
As I predicted would happen.
It is not an assumption that crits are pushing Critical Pedagogy into the US public education system to create a new proletariat and have been for decades.
This has nothing to do with what I’m discussing here, and yes it is a major assumption anyway.
By you. I reject your limitation.
and yes it is a major assumption anyway.
No, it’s not. It is a statement of purpose. It is included in Transformative CSEL for example.
By you. I reject your limitation.
You aren’t rejecting my limitation. You are rejecting the conservative limitation.
They’ve implied it’s more prevalent among LGBTQ.
Is it?
And it’s my understanding of the nature of sex crimes against kids that the vast majority of them are done by an adult that knows the kid…and so has gotten into a position of trust.
Interesting…you answered your own question.
There’s no absurdity here.
You’re making an emotional argument, not a rational one.
No he’s right…I can go for months on job site and not see a single kid on the job.
The crime?
Yes it is.
It’s exactly the same.
Seriously?
Now who’s allowing emotions get in there way?
JayJay:They’ve implied it’s more prevalent among LGBTQ.
Is it?
Yep. Even you’ve implied it. Do you deny it?
JayJay:The crime?
Yes it is.
It’s exactly the same.
Seriously?
Now who’s allowing emotions get in there way?
How is the crime different?
The crime…focus solely on the crime when talking about the differences.