Revisionism. Read the law.

How are these teachers qualified to have these “classroom discussions”? Are they child psychologists? Are they trained on the subject?

3 Likes

Societies create problems for the ugly, the stupid, the short, the fat, the weak, the abnormally tall, skinny… awkward, etc etc.

Are homosex children somehow more entitled to have other children indoctrinated into accepting and imitating them? Why?

3 Likes

They’re trolling.

How are teachers qualified to stop kids from calling classmates the N-word? Or from talking to kids about mentally challenged classmates? Or a host of other issues that teachers deal with?

The law addresses classroom discussions on gender identity. How are they qualified?

1 Like

I don’t know. Perhaps a teacher can chime in on this.

But how do they learn to handle race issues, or bullying issues or other difficult and sensitive things that they face? Professional development? Seminars?

Oh so you’re admitting it might be environmental factors…interesting. Not only you admitted that it’s abnormal but environment does play into it.

Thanks FT for being honest.

Was going to say that but didn’t want to derail. And yes people need religion/faith etc. It’s what keeps some people grounded.

What rock have you been hiding under? The research has pointed towards a combination of genetic and environmental factors for years now. And of course its abnormal. So is Heterochromia, but its also natural and not reasonable to discriminate over.

Same with other behavioral disorders… like addiction and violence. Genetic and environmental. So that means addiction and violence are OK for kids?

Human trafficking determines that to be untrue.

They don’t.

You know the answer, they aren’t.

:rofl: Analogy fail

1 Like

Prison.

2 Likes

Adults can be conditioned too, no doubt.

1 Like

No, why would you think that?

Exactly.

By acknowledging individual differences and that same sex couples exist.

That’s it.

I think 1) because someone (or group) has to be blamed for it and, relatedly, 2) if it’s genetic, then it’s difficult and unseemly to make sanctimonious moral judgments of it.