You might be interested in the Nixon tax scandal…
The IRS looks for tax code violations. Nothing more.
So you honestly don’t care to know if our president is profiting personally from the policies he is setting for the country?
Boy, is that a dumb statement.
If, for example, Trump was invested in american coal production, suddenly we would realize his interest in revitalizing that industry might not really be about bringing jobs back to WV. It might be about making himself rich.
Or, if he was invested in Russian assets, we might see why he isn’t allowing more sanctions on russia.
Or, his tax returns might show expenditures to russian firms set up to collect payments to keep the pee pee tapes hidden.
All these things effect us.
You do realize Trump is our employee, right? Not the other way around.
How about the Secretary of Commerce secretly being invested in a Russian Shipping Interest?
Why does that guy still have a job?
How about the Secretary of Commerce secretly being invested in a Russian Shipping Interest?
Why does that guy still have a job?
Probably because Trump is similarly invested.
That’s funny. This goes without saying, but you know damn well Republicans would gave lost their ■■■■ if Obama did the same thing. Harassing??? Yeah okay. Damn partisan hypocrites
Boy, is that a dumb statement.
If, for example, Trump was invested in american coal production, suddenly we would realize his interest in revitalizing that industry might not really be about bringing jobs back to WV. It might be about making himself rich.
Or, if he was invested in Russian assets, we might see why he isn’t allowing more sanctions on russia.
Or, his tax returns might show expenditures to russian firms set up to collect payments to keep the pee pee tapes hidden.
All these things effect us.
You do realize Trump is our employee, right? Not the other way around.
If? Might? LOL
It’s your time. Spend it how you wish.
DOLOOP:Who cares? It’s within their power.
The lesson from Republicans, from the Merrick Garland episode to their support of Donald Trump, is that if they can, they should.
Unexercised power is wasted power.
Spoken like a true tyrant.
Heh. You just don’t know when to take me literally or when to take me seriously.
That’s funny. This goes without saying, but you know damn well Republicans would gave lost their ■■■■ if Obama did the same thing. Harassing??? Yeah okay. Damn partisan hypocrites
Bullying then. Is that better?
This place is turning into an arm of CNN.
Jamerican:That’s funny. This goes without saying, but you know damn well Republicans would gave lost their ■■■■ if Obama did the same thing. Harassing??? Yeah okay. Damn partisan hypocrites
Bullying then. Is that better?
This place is turning into an arm of CNN.
Yup. People keep being mean to mr. nice guy.
Well how would you ever know if you don’t see he returns? This is why presidents release them.
Obama was the first president to weaponize the IRS… I doubt he’ll be the last…
George W Bush did it.
The President has been audited by the IRS for the last 12 years. What do you think they could have overlooked? Russians hiding in there perhaps?
The IRS would review financial transactions as to their legality. Congress would look at financial transactions as to whether or not those transactions may compromise the President.
Jamerican:Was it the IRS that said, despite the audit it does not keep him from submitting his tax returns? I vaguely remember that being said, but that was long ago, so I’m sure.
He can and he said so. Is it a requirement? No.
Democrats will do anything to continue harassing the President.
And that’s where the separation of powers comes in. If they are not able to show a valid legislative purpose, then the sole reason for this is to harass the President.
Impenitent:Obama was the first president to weaponize the IRS… I doubt he’ll be the last…
George W Bush did it.
How about J. Edgar Hoover?
Piper: Jamerican:Was it the IRS that said, despite the audit it does not keep him from submitting his tax returns? I vaguely remember that being said, but that was long ago, so I’m sure.
He can and he said so. Is it a requirement? No.
Democrats will do anything to continue harassing the President.
And that’s where the separation of powers comes in. If they are not able to show a valid legislative purpose, then the sole reason for this is to harass the President.
With all the known conflicts of interest that trump has? Child, please.
How about J. Edgar Hoover?
Ok,
10char.
With all the known conflicts of interest that trump has? Child, please.
The House Oversight Committee will be very busy. The current Congress has provided basically no oversight. It is difficult to know where to start.
Samm:Yes. Based on the Harry Reid president.
Harry Reid was never president. He also didn’t set the precedent you’re thinking he did. Sure he talked a big game but that was just bluster. He never sat on a single supreme nomination
Nobody was talking about the President.
Yes. Based on the Harry Reid president.
Harry Reid was never president. He also didn’t set the precedent you’re thinking he did. Sure he talked a big game but that was just bluster. He never sat on a single supreme nomination
Nobody was talking about the President.
Samm,
You probably should have said “precedent” instead of “president” then.
.>>>>