Democrats claim election fraud in N.Y. , charge Trump with sedition for doing same

Tguns · 2021-02-10T04:39:10.414Z

Borgia_dude:

Strange response on your part.

I have no doubt it is.

Borgia_dude · 2021-02-10T04:41:51.377Z

PurpnGold:

WuWei:

Yes. It would work.

Keep in my mind we aren’t even discussing hermetically storing the apparatus as we are discussing voting machines.

Can you imagine a machine from 1521 working today? I doubt a mousetrap from that era would work today.

WuWei · 2021-02-10T04:44:45.015Z

Borgia_dude:

PurpnGold:

WuWei:

Yes. It would work.

Keep in my mind we aren’t even discussing hermetically storing the apparatus as we are discussing voting machines.

Can you imagine a machine from 1521 working today? I doubt a mousetrap from that era would work today.

It would work.

WuWei · 2021-02-10T04:45:30.163Z

Borgia_dude:

as we are discussing voting machines.

The voting machines weren’t stored for 500 years.

Borgia_dude · 2021-02-10T04:52:14.995Z

WuWei:

Borgia_dude:

as we are discussing voting machines.

The voting machines weren’t stored for 500 years.

As you said, they would work though, right?

TheDoctorIsIn · 2021-02-10T04:56:03.287Z

New York should never have mothballed the lever machines.

Tguns · 2021-02-10T04:58:29.792Z

Not to rudely interject on what appears to by an intricate engineering argument…but.

A. We’re not talking about a complex piece of electronic instrumentation. Hell, it’s not even as complex as a spectrum analyzer.

B. We’re talking about a digital abicus that (should have) been designed for long periods of non use between high volume demand.

C. If these machines are incapable of living up to the megar parameters set forth in B…why the hell are we depending on them in choosing “leadership”?

And

D. Talk to Trump and his whinging about losing the election, seems you have a good argument to make some money off of him with.

Striker840 · 2021-02-10T05:01:42.901Z

Huh?
What was that drivel???

You OBVIOUSLY are not familiar with why machines are used in say ANYTHING!!

Once a machine has been calibrated, setup, configured and shut down it WILL keep said settings.

Machines/robots are used precisely for reasons previously stated…repeatability of said process, repeatability of results, especially when used for optical scanning operations.

But of course your degree in Engineering…oh wait, you don’t have a degree in Engineering???

Borgia_dude · 2021-02-10T07:34:54.221Z

Striker840:

Huh?
What was that drivel???

You OBVIOUSLY are not familiar with why machines are used in say ANYTHING!!

Once a machine has been calibrated, setup, configured and shut down it WILL keep said settings.

Very highly likely, yes. Absolute reliability? I’m less confident.

But of course your degree in Engineering…oh wait, you don’t have a degree in Engineering???

Uh oh. You got me now! I take it you are an engineer? May I ask, what type?

Striker840 · 2021-02-10T15:10:40.880Z

Have not graduated yet, but will be a Manufacturing Engineer.

Also have spent the majority of the last 15 years in IT working with engineers, mostly in manufacturing environments so I can say with confidence that again once a machine is configured, software settings applied, and manual settings set that once a machine has been configured as above and shut down properly, when powered up 99.9% of the time after post startup testing is done the machine WILL retain all settings. There is no absolute and you know that so your little “gotcha” attempt falls flat.

Why do you think manufacturing has gone to robotics and machines…easy answer is again…repeatability, especially with optical scanner systems. Unless someone bumps the scanner eye it will consistently scan correctly time after time after time.

johnwk2 · 2021-02-10T15:43:55.047Z

Striker840:

You consistently told sneaky the answer to his question was in the complaint. It was not, it is quite simple.

He asked “how does a machine under count”
You consistently answered “it is explained in the complaint”.

Turns out, that it was not, thus not an answer to Sneaky.

How dare someone askes “how does a machine under count”?

Of course, there is a list of stupid debating tricks, one of which is posting a link, without quoting from the link, and alleging the answer is to be found at the link.

Having spent a considerable time on Capitol Hill, I’ve learned almost every one of their stupid debating tricks.

JWK

Our socialist/fascist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.

johnwk2 · 2021-02-10T15:52:03.699Z

Jezcoe:

No… Trump claims

Trump claimed voting machines were found to be inaccurate. And Trump was spot on about the voting machines being inaccurate, but only he was accused of inciting a riot for speaking the truth!

Judge Releases Dominion Audit Report; Report Claims System ‘Designed’ To ‘Create Systemic Fraud’

“The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error detailed above by the vote ‘flip’ from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race,” reads the report by Allied Security Operations Group. “We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.”

Of course, our Fifth Column Media and their Yellow journalists panhandled the same line you do. But the truth cannot be changed to what it is not!

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, in addition to Facebook, Twitter ETC., and countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

PurpnGold · 2021-02-10T15:55:38.756Z

johnwk2:

Trump claimed voting machines were found to be inaccurate.

johnwk2:

“The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error detailed above by the vote ‘flip’ from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error

Emphasis mine

johnwk2 · 2021-02-10T15:59:34.550Z

PurpnGold:

johnwk2:

Trump claimed voting machines were found to be inaccurate.

johnwk2:

“The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error detailed above by the vote ‘flip’ from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error

Emphasis mine

A curious “human error” in which vote machines flipped approximately 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden all by themselves.

Aside from that, Trump was absolutely correct about vote machine inaccuracy, and yet, he was accused of inciting a riot for daring to state a truth.while the slime ball "Steel Dossier’ lawyer representing the N.Y. Democrat candidate is allowed to argue voting machines were inaccurate without any repercussions.

JWK

Our socialist/fascist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.

PurpnGold · 2021-02-10T16:11:45.698Z

johnwk2:

A curious “human error” in which vote machines flipped approximately 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden all by themselves.

Do you have evidence to prove that the machines actually flipped the vote by themselves… without human intervention?

johnwk2:

Aside from that, Trump was absolutely correct about vote machine inaccuracy

No he isn’t. The voting machines were not inaccurate.

johnwk2 · 2021-02-10T16:40:16.670Z

PurpnGold:

johnwk2:

A curious “human error” in which vote machines flipped approximately 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden all by themselves.

Do you have evidence to prove that the machines actually flipped the vote by themselves… without human intervention?

Do you have any evidence that voting machines operate without any human involvement?

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, want elderly American citizens, who were forced to pay into Medicare all their lives, to surrender and share their Medicare Trust fund with millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders. LINK

Borgia_dude · 2021-02-10T17:31:50.395Z

Striker840:

Have not graduated yet, but will be a Manufacturing Engineer.

Good luck with your career. Being an engineer can be very rewarding and fulfilling.

Also have spent the majority of the last 15 years in IT working with engineers, mostly in manufacturing environments so I can say with confidence that again once a machine is configured, software settings applied, and manual settings set that once a machine has been configured as above and shut down properly, when powered up 99.9% of the time after post startup testing is done the machine WILL retain all settings. There is no absolute and you know that so your little “gotcha” attempt falls flat.

You are assuming a lot, the biggest being perfect storage.

I don’t doubt that a piece of equipment will retain their settings. It is more about whether the equipment is in spec during subsequent operation. Settings do not guarantee spec.

Most of our lab equipment requires yearly calibration, which doesn’t mean it falls out during that time.

Striker840 · 2021-02-10T17:37:15.881Z

Thanks, career change forced by covid. Got laid off but since I am a disabled vet the VA is paying for me to finish my 4 year degree.

If specs don’t change, and the previous settings were in spec they should be good to go. IF specs change then yes the machine would need recalibrate to be back in spec.

Lab equipment is MUCH more sensitive and specs are often much tighter.
A simple optical scanner should not need adjusted on power up if it was in spec when shut down.
The caveat to that would be if the scanner was knocked around while powered down.

Borgia_dude · 2021-02-10T17:55:41.776Z

Striker840:

Thanks, career change forced by covid. Got laid off but since I am a disabled vet the VA is paying for me to finish my 4 year degree.

If specs don’t change, and the previous settings were in spec they should be good to go. IF specs change then yes the machine would need recalibrate to be back in spec.

Lab equipment is MUCH more sensitive and specs are often much tighter.
A simple optical scanner should not need adjusted on power up if it was in spec when shut down.
The caveat to that would be if the scanner was knocked around while powered down.

I’m not familiar with the complexities of voting machinery. But of the thousands of voting machines, I’m pretty sure some have been roughly handled. I agree the vast majority stay within spec. As you mentioned, 99.9% are fine, but that still would leave one out of a thousand.

Btw, I had a graduate class in Reliability where we did a lot of the math for sampling schemes.

tnt · 2021-02-10T18:11:15.774Z

WuWei:

Right. FrauD

Can you point out where they Ds are claiming fraud?