If that’s true, then it’s probably a good idea that we extend medicare to everyone so that they will.
The sources are at the bottom, right where you read that. Knock yourself out. (you wont)
RTchoke
167
Yes, they are. They also say they could be full of ■■■■ in their disclaimer.
I don’t have time to hold your hand.
RTchoke
169
I don’t have time to listen to pie in the sky ■■■■■■■■■
You want socialism and single payer so bad, there are plenty of countries to choose from.
Time to scream hopelessly at the sky?
1 Like
Ok that’s just plain funny.
They’ve been almost invisible since declaring. 
So did Hillary at the same point in 2016. How did that work out at the Polls?
They’d have to be able to generate the turnout.
Well no, that’s the whole problem. Focusing on “communities” does nothing but foment division.
Of course it does. Every time you do so you’re sowing division because you are focusing on groups instead of the whole. That does nothing but create hard feelings between he whole and whatever “aggrieved group:” you single out.
2 Likes
It doesn’t. There’s already division.
No there isn’t. There is no division until you identify and isolate a given group from the whole.
Yes, there is a division. Ignoring it does not mean it goes away.
Reminded me of 2016 gop debates
1 Like
There can be no dividing until you start dividing us into groups.
Basic math.
Until you cut up a pie it’s whole.
The math is used to recognize an already existing division.