Yeah. I hate those. It’s essentially a Microsoft version of a fact-checker. Utterly unreliable, like the rest.
And as I said before, it is no longer a blunder once you have obviously been made aware it is a violation of federal law and have yet to retract, and if she isn’t aware and the admin isn’t aware it shows an extreme level of incompetency or malevolence. Pick one.
2 Likes
Exactly. I gave my opinion on the bones of his screenplay in my opener. I believe the Dem hierarchy will do whatever it takes to retilt the SC away from a constitutionalist majority. And their is no bottom or moral restraints on what they could try, if they convince themselves they can get away with it.
And some of these are people have convinced themselves that Trump-Russia collusion happened and that biological males can get pregnant. So, I don’t think that for them to believe that they can walk away untouched if a few of their useful idiot followers seriously injure or kill a SC Justice or three, or their families is beyond to them.
1 Like

zantax:

Supreme_War_Pig:

zantax:
On topic away.
Cool.
And as I said before, it is no longer a blunder once you have obviously been made aware it is a violation of federal law and have yet to retract, and if she isn’t aware and the admin isn’t aware it shows an extreme level of incompetency or malevolence. Pick one.
Well, given that her answer was:
"I don’t have an official U.S. government position of where people protest, we want it of course to be peaceful. And certainly the president would want peoples’ privacy to be respected, but I think that we shouldn’t lose the point here – the reason people are protesting is that women across the country are worried about their fundamental rights that have been law for 50 years, the rights to make choices about their own jobs and own health care are at risk. That’s why people are protesting, they’re unhappy, they’re scared."
…and not the bloody minded calm to action that you want to pretend it was, I will go with incompetence.

Supreme_War_Pig:

zantax:

Supreme_War_Pig:

zantax:
On topic away.
Cool.
And as I said before, it is no longer a blunder once you have obviously been made aware it is a violation of federal law and have yet to retract, and if she isn’t aware and the admin isn’t aware it shows an extreme level of incompetency or malevolence. Pick one.
Well, given that her answer was:
"I don’t have an official U.S. government position of where people protest, we want it of course to be peaceful. And certainly the president would want peoples’ privacy to be respected, but I think that we shouldn’t lose the point here – the reason people are protesting is that women across the country are worried about their fundamental rights that have been law for 50 years, the rights to make choices about their own jobs and own health care are at risk. That’s why people are protesting, they’re unhappy, they’re scared."
…and not the bloody minded calm to action that you want to pretend it was, I will go with incompetence.
Again, that window has passed, there has been no correction, I can understand incompetence in the moment but we are many moments past that.
We are talking huge staffs here, is it your contention nobody has yet to notify them protesting outside judges houses is against federal law? Defies logic.
2 Likes
The words “Schiff” and “Screenplay” don’t appear in your opener. I honestly don’t know what you are talking about here.
Well obviously you believe this. That doesn’t make it any less of a conservative fever dream.
Have any of these crazy predictions ever come true? Seriously, this is Secret ACA Army level nonsense
I mean yeah, it took me an entire day to find out, but I am not a huge whitehouse staff.

Supreme_War_Pig:

zantax:

Supreme_War_Pig:

zantax:

Supreme_War_Pig:

zantax:
On topic away.
Cool.
And as I said before, it is no longer a blunder once you have obviously been made aware it is a violation of federal law and have yet to retract, and if she isn’t aware and the admin isn’t aware it shows an extreme level of incompetency or malevolence. Pick one.
Well, given that her answer was:
"I don’t have an official U.S. government position of where people protest, we want it of course to be peaceful. And certainly the president would want peoples’ privacy to be respected, but I think that we shouldn’t lose the point here – the reason people are protesting is that women across the country are worried about their fundamental rights that have been law for 50 years, the rights to make choices about their own jobs and own health care are at risk. That’s why people are protesting, they’re unhappy, they’re scared."
…and not the bloody minded calm to action that you want to pretend it was, I will go with incompetence.
Again, that window has passed, there has been no correction, I can understand incompetence in the moment but we are many moments past that.
More incompetence?
The answer you are looking for is malevolence.
No, my contention is that you and the OP are mountanizing a molehill. Tempesting a tea pot. Blowing proportions. Pick your metaphor.
Yeah it’s not enough the GOP is being forced to deal with an election that is massively unpopular virtually everywhere in the country and will drastically affect one of their core demos, three-M suburban moms 35 to 64.
Of course that is what you think. I knew that going in.
What will you say if a justice gets killed because their address was doxxed?
More importantly, what will you say when it doesn’t happen?
Do you ever retract any of this nonsense? I mean like, ever?
1 Like
I will say it reality sure has became a lot like The Pelican Brief and makes just as much sense as it did in that movie.

Supreme_War_Pig:
More importantly, what will you say when it doesn’t happen?
Do you ever retract any of this nonsense? I mean like, ever?
And by nonsense you mean violation of federal law that was enacted to ensure our justice system could not be held hostage by mobs?
2 Likes
No, I mean this nonsense: