Democrat op-ed proposes "vote reparations"

Then he must be one idiot of a professor.

Just have to be black to vote twice.

Not one person here has shown support.

Iā€™m proud of youā€¦ :roll_eyes:

Of course, that statement cam with a big ā€œbutā€. :man_shrugging:

No he didnā€™t. You totally fabricated that. Nothing new from you though.

That wasnā€™t my question.

And thereā€™s another fabrication. In fact, itā€™s a deliberate slander against an honored guest.

It answers your question.

Or itā€™s a discussion provoker.

What possible discussion could come from such an idiotic proposal? That this guy is a moron and shouldnā€™t even be listened to?

Uh, youā€™re talking about it.

Yeahā€¦ and not taking anything this guy writes seriously ever again. Seems like heā€™s writing himself to irrelevancy.

As you still discuss him, his opinion, and the idea of reparations.

Seems he provoked you, no?

Isnt possible to not support an idea but understand why the idea exists?

:wink:

No it isnā€™t. Relax

Yep. And shut me off to everything even more. No matter who is proposing whatever idea.

Facts donā€™t matter

Clearly.

Your ā€œbutā€ didnā€™t do that though. You followed up with your (YOUR) standard justification for why we need reparations.

And your follow-up quote to demonstrate that the OP ā€œis making statements as if it is already mainstream,ā€ does nothing of the sort. You have to insist that ā€œpartsā€ equals ā€œmainstreamā€.

Maybe you believe that, but I truly believe you do not.

Yet another thread where I show you using dishonest statements in your arguments.

OK, then itā€™s just a little lie. Whatever.

Right? His unprovoked attacks are getting really old.

1 Like