Deep South Freedom

[SottoVoce]

@WuWei

@SottoVoce

AKA bigotry and segregation.

The next time you wax poetic at the injustice of private locations not allowing firearms, we can point to your hypocrisy in this thread.

AK A? TRIGGERED! Again, the right of the property owner to be bigoted and decide the rules for the privilege of access to the same.

Hypocrisy? You must not be familiar with the law. They put up signs!!! telling me to stay out.

Know what I do? Move on. And I can’t make them serve me or even go in. Their house, their rules.

Me? Triggered? Funny.

I find it interesting people continue to support discrimination based on race, sexual orientation, or other archaic classifications. I also find it sad people seem so zealous to do so.

You support bigotry. What does that make you? Hint: not a non-bigot.

[Jezcoe]

@LucyLou

So most cons like the use of Religious Freedom to deny service to people of certain races or mixes of races. Cool.

Just like Jesus would do.

[coolidge]

@PizzaReverend

Twitter bans outright racist “Conservative” Trolls

Trumpists: WAAAAAAAHHHHHH WERE BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST

Mississippi Racists Want to ban Mixed Race Weddings:

Trumpists: They are free to do what they want because FREEDOM

Yeah we all get it now.

Sarah Huckabee sanders is trying to have dinner with her family at a restaurant.
Liberals celebrate the right for a business to kick her out.
But those same liberals are now saying how wrong it is for a business to do that to this couple.

[calirepub]

@LucyLou

So most cons like the use of Religious Freedom to deny service to people of certain races or mixes of races. Cool.

You don’t need religion at all. If a business owner wants to discriminate against anyone that should be their right. If a business owner doesn’t want to install a handicap ramp because it’ll cost too much money to serve people in wheelchairs, that’s up to them. Maybe it doesn’t make business sense to serve certain classes of people. Do you seriously want to put people out of business just because they don’t want to serve certain people?

[WuWei]

@FloridaYankee

Perhaps. We’ve been down this road, rather extensively you and I. Restaurants, gas stations, hotels, banks and a few others easily defined as necessities should in my opinion be subject to public accommodation laws that are strictly enforced.

As an addendum, I have yet to envisage never mind name a new political party that can encompass both our views on this. That has been the sticking point, not me dropping or ignoring that discussion.

I looked, there are at least 3 other venues in that town and 185 in that area.

[CanadianJudo]

You lost that freedom when you segregated 10 + million people.

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

Me? Triggered? Funny.

I find it interesting people continue to support discrimination based on race, sexual orientation, or other archaic classifications. I also find it sad people seem so zealous to do so.

You support bigotry. What does that make you? Hint: not a non-bigot.

No, me.

I support property rights.

I have a right to be a bigot.

[LucyLou]

Well, it just makes it easier and prettier to say that one’s Deeply Held Religious Beliefs mean they don’t care to participate in events including disabled people or people of different races.

[coolidge]

@Kevhead

@WuWei

What about the owner’s rights?

When you open a business to people you cant do as you want. That libertarian ■■■■■■■■ doesnt fly

So you have to give up your rights in order to operate a business?

[CanadianJudo]

political belief isn’t a protected class.

why do we have protected classes? because of segregation.

thank for coming to my TED talk.

[Kevhead]

@calirepub

Do you seriously want to put people out of business just because they don’t want to serve certain people?

Yes 10char

[FloridaYankee]

@WuWei

@FloridaYankee

Perhaps. We’ve been down this road, rather extensively you and I. Restaurants, gas stations, hotels, banks and a few others easily defined as necessities should in my opinion be subject to public accommodation laws that are strictly enforced.

As an addendum, I have yet to envisage never mind name a new political party that can encompass both our views on this. That has been the sticking point, not me dropping or ignoring that discussion.

I looked, there are at least 3 other venues in that town and 185 in that area.

It it’s to be a law, it can only be across the board, not selectively relevant.

[Jezcoe]

For I was hungry and you saw that I was gay and said hit the road.

For I was thirsty and you saw that I was in a mixed raced relationship and you said no wedding to be had here.

[SottoVoce]

@WuWei

@SottoVoce

Me? Triggered? Funny.

I find it interesting people continue to support discrimination based on race, sexual orientation, or other archaic classifications. I also find it sad people seem so zealous to do so.

You support bigotry. What does that make you? Hint: not a non-bigot.

No, me.

I support property rights.

I have a right to be a bigot.

You either support a bigot because you’re a bigot or you don’t support a bigot because you’re not a bigot.

Or you try to deflect, saying you’re not a bigot but support bigots because of “freedom.” Which makes you a hypocrite.

So, hypocrite in the name of freedom or bigot?

[Excast]

@coolidge

So you have to give up your rights in order to operate a business?

Of course.

I have a right to serve rotting food in my house if I want. I don’t have a right to do that if I own a restaurant. When you make the decision to open your doors to the public that comes with a large number of regulations you are forced to follow.

[Nemesis]

@WuWei

@SottoVoce

Me? Triggered? Funny.

I find it interesting people continue to support discrimination based on race, sexual orientation, or other archaic classifications. I also find it sad people seem so zealous to do so.

You support bigotry. What does that make you? Hint: not a non-bigot.

No, me.

I support property rights.

I have a right to be a bigot.

So are you a bigot?

[conan]

As long as they don’t push for laws…or hide behind the laws to impose themselves onto others.

[LucyLou]

No, you should definitely keep your Deeply Held Religious Beliefs to not serve “certain people” or “certain mixes of people”. And advertise that.

[mobulis]

@matt1618

Big difference. It is crazy that in this day and age you deny services based on the color of the skin. No one should be denied because the couple is of different races.

However if one believes that the act of homosexuality is a sin, and that marriage is only between a man and a woman, even if the government says otherwise, they should not be forced to host something what recognizing what they say is a sin.

However the thing on race is ridiculous and would never defend that racist outlook.

Except they don’t get to determine what is a sin.

[Excast]

The people who have spent untold generations demanding that their government use it’s power to oppress women, minorities, LGBTQ, and people of other religions are upset about laws being imposed on people now.