I see a lot of those complaints going back to the early couple of months of the pandemic when no one really knew what the ■■■■ to do.

I have not seen the type of stuff like roping off sections of stores and such since like May of 2020.

Doing things like that… I just don’t see it happening anymore.

Good Gawds.

Says who?

Who decides what is and isn’t essential?

If many are staying home while forced out of their jobs, shouldn’t they have some entertainment for their mental well being?

It got so bad Amazon workers were trying to avoid shipping “inessential items”, like books and craft projects some wanted to keep themselves occupied.

I find terms like “essential” and “inessential” to be disturbing when describing employees and business owners.

1 Like

To some extent it’s still taking place here.

A young woman whose small business opening I attended in 2019 is still under restriction as to the number of students she can admit to her studio.

She now has a second job to make up for loss of income. Some still use terms like “essential workers” to get out of trouble with the police.

Two years have passed quickly. Some, however, are still stuck in the mindset and restrictions from that time period.

Only if you put some spin on it. I mean, five times more likely to die if unvaxxed sounds a lot scarier than saying the chance goes from 105 per million people to 532 per million.

Well if you cared at 105 then you should be 5x more worried at 532.

If you never cared at 105… then I doubt you care at 532

No I shouldn’t, they are both a very small chance of dying. And that is not even considering variables such as weight, age and underlying conditions. The risk obviously being much less for the young and healthy.

1 Like

This is really humane and will improve patient morale—NOT:

It’s the same in Massachusetts hospitals. I avoid them, anyway, except for outpatient services. I really don’t trust very many physicians or nurses in these venues.

Your life for the last 40 years has been anything but “normal.”

1 Like

You didn’t read my post.

“If you never cared at 105… I doubt you care at 532.”

You literally fit that statement.

Has nothing to do with caring, it has to do with being rational. For comparison, you have a one in one hundred and seven chance of dying in a car accident over the course of your life.

Lame alright.

Clinging to that Covid posture.

Go do a victory lap with Brandon.

A five fold increase in death should scare most everyone. Especially if it can be easily prevented.

1 Like

You must be terrified to drive. 9,345 per million chance of dying.

1 Like

Not sure that is the more rational concern at this point in time. ~40,000 people a year die in auto accidents. There’s been ~550,000 deaths from covid in the year since since vaccines have been available.

1 Like

It’s rational to be afraid if you are elderly and or immunocompromised, otherwise, no. That 550k is not distributed evenly across the population.

What or who?

Nope… there has been decades of putting safety measures and risk reduction into motor vehicles.

it is all about assessing risk.

It is distributed heavily towards the unvaccinated.

1 Like

What goods or services and which workers?

I find the classifications rather disturbing unless on a strictly individual level, as in money is tight. Is this good or service something I or we as a family can’t live without?