Wait what? On what exactly?

:rofl:

So this is just some pedantry on your part? Yes, grand jurors can ask witnesses questions, to clarify testimony.

No.

No.

1 Like

:rofl:

Are you trying to claim that this happened, or is this just something you’ve imagined might have occurred?

Why is the grand jury relevant, at this point? He was convicted at the trial.

How silly of me I’ll be sure to not renew mine since they are pointless

Which makes witness tampering a thing.
Do you think the lead detective would have not looked into this before he filed an affidavit with the court?
Of course, if the DA videotaped those initial witness meetings, he should be in the clear. Wonder why he wouldn’t?

Pretty much everything.

Calm down. We have a governor, not a king.

1 Like

What does a king have to do with me and my wives open carry license in Texas?

Lack of accuracy on your part does not “pedantry” make.

1 Like

Do you know when he filed that affidavit?

What do you think he “looked into?”

:rofl:

Which means he can only act on the recommendation of the board. So if they agree with the jury and all was fair, no issue.

You do not have a “Texas open carry license.” Ask me how I know.

How many wives do you have?

:rofl:

Do you think that whether the Board “agrees with the jury” is the standard they use to recommend clemency?

You’re pretty sloppy with your words. For an attorney I mean.

3 Likes

Pretty much.

I think he looked into the definition of witness tampering and whether that had occurred in this case, before he filed an affidavit with the court.

It went from concealed or opened carried to concealed and open carry, you still need a license to walk in public with one. I have one wife don’t insult me. And we both have concealed and open licenses. You are arguing you can wave a gun in public without a license and that’s not the case in Texas.