Your problem is that it is conservative voters on here who are stating all the things they disagree with trump about. Along with saying they agree with him more than they disagree with him.
The democrats have been licking harris’s boots since the senile old pervert in the white house stepped down. Seems you have the cult wrong. It is your side of the aisle who fell into line just like good cult members when they were told harris is going to be your candidate.
3 Likes
cults have some sort of core belief, they have none. Just lemmings. Political slaves doing the master’s bidding.
DougBH
726
IMO Kamala should make up some excuse to avoid any debate. The media is recreating her as a moderate. Why should she open her mouth and destroy that image?
Samm
727
I didn’t say anything remotely like that. Why d’ya always have to make ■■■■ up?
Samm
728
The kids paying tax on their tips weren’t saying that. That’s who we are talking about here, service industry tax payers.
Samm
729
What’s stupid about it?
Are Harris supporters now MAGA Trump cultists?
Samm
730
Yep. Every time she speaks off teleprompter, she spews word salad nonsense. She should never speak extemporaneously anywhere there a hot microphone within earshot.
Not a Trump supporter 
She speaks just fine. It’s like you’ve never heard your favorite president speak.
Nemesis
732
Not taxing tips is never going to become reality. Thats why its stupid.
Samm
733
Once again, your logic fails you. Disrespect and disdain for Harris in no way equates to or represents support for Trump. You really ought to quit trying so hard. It serves no purpose except to make you look foolish.
Samm
734
What makes you think that? The leaders of both Parties are pushing it. How can it fail?
1 Like
You have not show the same disrespect and disdain for Trump… even thought he can string two sentences together. I’m not sure you’ve ever said anything bad about Trump.
Samm
736
You haven’t been paying attention. I say bad things about him frequently.
Here’s one I posted just a couple of minutes ago.
Great news! Kamala promises to fight inflation on day 1! - #321 by Samm
But of course the disrespect for him is not the same as for her. The things they do and have done to deserve disrespect are very different. He’s an uncouth egotist with a bad hairdo and she’s a worthless platitude salad maker with the laugh of a stoned horse. He at least has actually accomplished stuff, she hasn’t. So yeah, the disrespect I show is different.
I too have said my share. Trump is a cad, he doesn’t know when to shut the ■■■■ up and need to constantly add that one last thing is frustratingly stupid. he’s petty and vindictive.
Now, you tell us what you don’t like about Kamala? Do the masters allow that? Or, is complete adoration and worship required?
1 Like
Latest Senate Math: MT slipping away from Democrats would be the 51st seat.
Contested (lead is >0 but <4, 3 if incumbent w/1 poll over 50)
AZ: Gallego(D) up 3+ has broken 50% in one poll
Competitive (lead is >3i w/50 but <7, 6 if incumbent w/1 poll over 50)
MT: Sheehy(R) up 4+ has broken 50% in two polls
MI: Slotkin(D) up 5+ has broken 50% in two polls
OH: Brown(D) up 5 has broken 50% in two polls
FL: Scott(R) up 5+ pts has not broken 50% in any poll
NV: Rosen(D) up 4 has broken 50% in one poll (in Jun)
NJ: Kim(D) up 6 has not broken 50% in any poll
Note: MT moves from contested to competitive
Marginal (leading candidate up >6i w/50 but <9, 8 if incumbent w/1 poll over 50)
TX: Cruz(R) up 7+ has broken 50% in one poll
NM: Heinrich is up 7 has not broken 50% in any poll
PA: Casey up 7+ pts has broken 50% in five polls
Note: Removed WI; Baldwin. She’s breaking 50% consistantly
Note: TX back on Marginal list
Note: Bold denotes a possible flip
GOP must hold FL and TX and take any other seat for an outright majority. If Trump wins, they need only hold FL and TX
DEMs must hold all of their seats plus take FL or TX to keep a majority, or all except FL and TX if Harris wins
Note: If the Presidential race is tied, Trump will become President, but if the Senate is in the balance (50/50) Democrats could make Harris or Walz VP in order to hold the Senate.
And now, back to the subject of the thread!
Electoral Template. Change to 5-way polling. Leads shrink, fewer polls reach 50% threshold. 5-way polling seems to benefit whoever is trailing in any state in the 2-way (with the exceptions of MI and NH).
Contested states (lead is >0 but <4 and leader (over 3 pts) has broken 50% in fewer than 2 polls)
WI: Harris up 1+ has not broken 50% in any poll
MI: Harris up 2+ has broken 50% in one poll
PA: Harris up 1+ has not broken 50% in any poll
GA: Trump up 1+ has not broken 50% in any poll
AZ: Tie neither has broken 50% in any poll
NC: Trump up 1+ has not broken 50% in any poll
NV: Trump up 2+ has broken 50% in any poll
Competitive (lead is >3 but <7 and leader (over 6) has broken 50% in fewer than 2 polls)
VA: Harris up 4 has not broken 50% in any poll
NH: Harris up 6+ has not broken 50% in any poll.
FL: Trump up 5 has not broken 50% in any poll
MN: Harris up 6 has not broken 50% in any poll
Marginal (lead is >6 but <9 and leader (over 8) has broken 50% in fewer than 3 polls)
None
Note: This data includes 5-way polling where RFK is on the ballot, or his petition has not been denied (NY-saving democracy)
Note: If either wins the states they are currently leading in Harris needs only to win AZ to win, Trump needs AZ and NE2
Looking deeper at contested races the following races are the races that all of the pundit sites (Silver, Cook, DDHQ and Rotherberg) agree either will flip or stand the greatest chance of flipping:
Dem to GOP (Total gains: GOP+6)
NC-1/R+1 District; PA-8/R+4 District; WA-3/R+4 District;
NC-6/Redistricting; NC-13/Redistricting; NC-14/Redistricting
GOP to Dem (Total gains: Dem+5)
NY-17/D+3 District; LA-6/Redistricting; AL-2/Redistricting;
NY-22/D+5 District; NY-4/D+5 District
Note: In all other contested districts all of the pundit sites rate the remaining races toss ups or give a slight edge to the incumbent party.
Other House seats with the opportunity to flip (by party demographics) open seat most vulnerable
Contested (R1 to D1 or Incumbent underwater)
CA13(R)…CA27(R)…CO08(D)…MI07(D)…NM02(D)…OR05(R)
MI08(D)…OH13(D)…PA07(D)…WA08(D)…ME02(D)…OH09(D)
PA17(D)…NJ07(R)…NY19(R)…AK01(D)…CA22(R)…NE02(R)
CA45(R)…MN02(D)…NV03(D)…NH01(D)…MI03(D)…KS03(D)
VA07(D)…TX15(R)…PA01(R)
10R, 17D Most Vulnerable: 6R, 9D
Competitive R2-R4 and D2-D4
CA47(D)…AZ01(R)…OH01(D)…VA02(R)…AZ06(R)…CA41(R)
IA03(R)…WI03(R)…CA49(D)…MD06(D)…NV01(D)…NH02(D)
CT05(D)…IL17(D)…IN01(D)…NY18(D)…OR06(D)…TX28(D)
NV04(D)…NY03(D)…OR04(D)…CA03(R)…CA40(R)…IA01(R)
NY01(R)…WI01(R)…MI10(R)…CA45(R)
10R, 18D Most Vulnerable: 3R, 0D
Note: Vulnerability is based on party demographics for the district >+2 underwater or recent redistricting changes making the seat more competitive with a party demographic switch.
tnt
742
I still think it’s a stupid idea.
cook released new polls, they are included in the average. For those interested the poll is here.
demographically it is a little off, but not much except that it polls twice as many black people as Hispanics and 6% more women. The women isn’t bad, should be 4%, but close enough for polling.
reading the questions… bit of a push poll. very poorly designed questions unless they were going for a result instead of searching for one. Still, probably not far off.
ETA: This poll was taken before Walz was selected so, IMO there is a bit of “my guy” exuberance reflected.
