James Bond is James Bond. He can’t be non-binary. He can’t be a male feminist. He can’t be trans or whatever else they want to drag into it.
Bond as a character is one of the ultimate fictional expressions of masculinity. He’s determined, loyal to both his comrades and his nation, focused on his job, popular with the ladies, and lethal on mission.
In Goldeneye, M (Judi Dench) called him a relic of the Cold War in one of her opening lines. To me that’s not an insult. He’s one of those idealized figures in classic media. Not many can measure up to his portrayal, but it’s aspirational. What man doesn’t want to be that popular with the ladies and go around the world as a lethal spy defending queen and country?
Don’t get me wrong, I do like the Dalton and Craig films for exploring Bond’s emotional stability and giving us glimpses into his psyche and how he copes with it all. And I like the Craig eras depiction of Bond actually being in love with one particular woman more so than his womanizing past and that he will do everything necessary to protect her, as a man should in the real world should do.
But there’s a limit to that depiction. Does Bond fit the current woke ass current reality of the world? No he doesn’t. But a character like Bond still has a place in this society despite all the woke ■■■■■■■■■
In case anyone hasn’t noticed, I’m a huge Bond fan. But I’m a little worried about where they may attempt to take the franchise. I was real concerned about No Time to Die after the first trailer but I’ll say that the movie surprised me. The wokeness was kept to a minimum and they were fair to the Bond character. He was a little overly emotional during the film, which isn’t really a Bond characteristic, but considering one the films key plot points (which I won’t spoil) it makes sense.
I do think the more anyone posts the same opinion over and over on a particular topic - such as “crits” and what it’s doing to our society - it suggests upset feelings, at a minimum, and probably much more.
Despite Fox’s efforts to tart this up, it’s hardly new or sensational. Sandra Newman’s doing what lots of writers have done over the years. Or is it different somehow?
• Joyce Carol Oates’s The Lady with the Pet Dog retells Chekhov’s story of the same name from the female character’s perspective.
• John Gardner’s Grendel retells Beowulf from Grendel’s point of view.