Should I have been discriminated against due to my hairstyle? Yes or no?
JayJay
343
Gonna need more than that, please.
Given this is such a sore subject that causes such consternation, one would think âwhite cultureâ would be so easy to define.
What is âwhite cultureâ? What are you fearing will be âlostâ?
in some circumstances sure
you have been using the word and making the case for it
still havent explained adequately though how by whom etc
maybe
some hairstyles may not be appr for everything
UPS drivers until recently maybe i believe werenât allowed to have crazy long hair or beards
Piper
346
Ask the woke gang. Itâs their baby.
Can we agree on that definition? Yes or no? If no, please provide your definition
My hairstyle was not a safety issue. Thatâs literally the only reason hairstyle should be discriminated against
Itâs a yes or no answer. Using the variables in my personal scenario, was hair discrimination appropriate?
whether i agree or not with how you define it is not impt. youâre trying to confine the discussion for your benefit likely
again. you have been using the word so it evidently already is defined by you in some sense
explain how, and weâll go from there
Guntsu
350
Should the intolerant be tolerated?
where did i say it was a safety issue??
no that is not the only reason
i see what you do here. you just go around and around never addressing fully what youve been asked even tho it is about your central argument
common tactic
JayJay
352
No itâs âyour babyâ since you fear âwhite culture being done away withâ.
Donât you think you should be able to describe what you fear losing before you fear losing it?
You donât have to agree with my definition. I asked that if you didnât agree to provide your own. Maybe I will agree with yours.
However if we cannot agree on the definition of oppression then there is no point debating what is or isnât oppression.
2 Likes
I never said you did.
I gave you one scenario where hair discrimination is appropriate. For safety concerns.
Given my scenario⌠was hair discrimination appropriate? Yes or no? Why wonât you answer the question.
youve been using the word throughout the thread.
you cant define what you thought it meant?
if we cant agree on what a word that you used reputedly means, we cant discuss what you meant by it?? manâŚ,
now i didnt go to law school, but that sounds like a copout
what a waste of time
WuWei
356
Nice. Straight up Marcuse.
Guntsu
357
Should I tolerate a racists?
Do racists not seek hegemony?
For the third time. Iâve already defined it.
âProlonged unjust treatmentâ
Thatâs the definition I accept. Remember it for every time you see me use the term.
Do you accept that definition? IF NOT, provide a definition that you accept. I might actually agree with you
That is correct. It is possible we disagree on what specific examples provided are considered âoppressionâ. I think that disagreement may start with differing definitions of what âoppressionâ means. So I am attempting to solidify the foundation of our discussion by seeing if we can agree on the definition.
If we cannot agree on the definition, then we should you and I should stop talking about it.
WuWei
360
Thatâs up to you. In your space
What is your definition. I might agree with yours.