They don’t commit violent crime at those rates, so unless we think cops are going around killing people at random you don’t break it down by raw population.
Who says racism has to have a consistent expression or target?
Can’t I express racism towards Mexicans but not express that same racism towards Asians?
My father in law loves his grandkids (my kids). He would die for them. He last said two weeks ago “I’m glad you didn’t give them names like daquan and shaniqua” while talking to his daughter, my wife.
I told him how ignorant and borderline racist that was and his response was “I didn’t know, I thought it was funny”
So I guess there is a difference between being racist and doing/saying racist things.
A racist believes his race is superior to others. Why on earth would a racist marry another race?
Way to miss the point. It’s the elevated violent behavior that invites police action. Additional police action increases your chances of being shot. Even with more arrests, they’re still less likely to be shot than whites.
As to the link to Vanderbilt, that’s just hilarious. YES, we KNOW Liberals believe that nonsense. Doesn’t make it true. They have convinced an entire generation that they’re racist because very little ACTUAL racism still exists. . . I’ll tell you what though, every time you have a riot and burn stuff to the ground, we risk going backwards.
What was confusing on the last part? You think riots are a legitimate petition to government for wrongs? Sounds very dangerous and no way to run a country to me.
For the left ALL encounters between a black person and white person in which the black person is the victim is defacto considered racism. And whenever it’s the other way around it’s never racism.
What purpose would this serve other than picking and choosing who to call a racist?
Maybe racism is not so prevalent as the libs would have us believe?