Those sons a bitches! How dare they make voting easier instead of more difficult.

Oh baby, I’m gonna fraud all up in this piece.

Call me the wizard, because I’m casting a thousand vote spell for Dr. Oz.

1 Like

Is that what happened?

The Supreme Court plans to hold oral argument Tuesday regarding the legal challenge the law. The justices’ decision to invalidate Leavitt’s order gives themselves more time to rule without facing a one-week deadline.

They said the law will remain in place, pending further action by the high court.

From a non-twitter spam link.

It’s not over yet.

1 Like

Definitely not over.

But if they allow another election to be held under Act 77 it is going to be hard to claim that discarding the 2020 results is an appropriate remedy if the law is eventually struck down.

It indicates how they are weighing the competing forces and that they don’t see the law as obvious and outright voter fraud.

Or it may be that, in the bizarre world of PA judicial politics, the SCt Justices are reluctant to strike down an incredibly popular law when they face retention elections.

This is going be my favorite act - 77 that is.

Gop- we will vote for it and then sue the state to render it unconstitutional within a couple of years

And screw the rule of law, the Constitution, which has been approved by the people?

It is not a judge’s job to decide if a law is popular or not.

JWK

“The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice.” – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968

1 Like