But that goes against their narrative.

JWK

2 Likes

Get your sarcasm detector checked.

He’s on your side.

1 Like

lol it’s ok i’ll be contributing to the thread

“Just over 2.5 million people voted under the law’s expansion of mail-in voting in 2020′s presidential election, most of them Democrats, out of 6.9 million total cast.”

Democrats knew their voting scheme for the lazy would favor democrats. this is how they “won” PA

2 Likes

“The two Democrats on the panel dissented. The state Supreme Court — where an appeal was expected shortly — has a 5-2 Democratic majority.“

and this is how the rules were changed right before election day to allow late as hell mail votes, screw signatures etc

win by any means necessary

4 Likes

none of this will matter. it will be appealed

democrat snakes already knew the plan long before this even happened

it’s also why people are losing faith in the election system. which is another nice byproduct for the democrats

4 Likes

It is how D strong arm wishy washy family to vote as they see fit.

The PA supreme court will not let this stand. The PA State Supreme court is the entity most responsible for undermining personal liberty and the election process and there is nothing that can be done about it.

Even with a R governor they will over rule any election revisions.

2 Likes

the democrats in the PA supreme court dont care about any “constitution” any more than the US supreme court does. they are the majority

they’ll do all they can to make it easy for inner city Phila to steer the elections and to scheme ballots if they dont

3 Likes

They were emboldened when they redrew the Congressional map the last time…now it looks like they have usurped that task from the state legislature.

They have taken it upon themselves to unleash mail in ballot fraud.

3 Likes

You are correct. They will follow their decision in Kelly and issue a precedential opinion ending all of this partisan bickering and upholding mail-in voting. No question. I know this Court and have been before them several times.

Wasn’t this the basis for the Texas case to the SCOTUS that they rejected to hear?

They can’t be impeached?

He’s on OUR side!

image

JWK

Why have a written constitution approved by the people if those who it is designed to limit and control are free to make it mean whatever they wish it to mean?

1 Like

The PA Legislature should just make the 2nd Tuesday in November an officially recognized religious holiday. They don’t have to make it a day off work, just officially recognized.

Then anyone can request a mail-in ballot by citing the holiday.

Easy, peasy.

WW

i got an even easier idea

no blanket mail in voting

done…and done

2 Likes

PA didn’t have “blanket” mail-in voting. A ballot had to be requested.

You may have confused that with Utah, a red state that has had 100% mail-in voting for years.

WW

“blanket” vs “absentee”.

sorry

no mail votes. except absentee

2 Likes

I caught the change, say you type absentee and change it to blanket.

Doesn’t change the fact that there are red and blue states that have doing all ballots cast by mail-in ballot for years and conducted safe and secure elections.

It’s interesting that mail-in voting wasn’t a problem before, but since Trump** lost suddenly it’s a bad thing.

Makes one wonder, is the issue mail in voting or if the issue is Trump** lost.

WW

i didnt know edits to posts are fair game vs the post itself. interesting

so what

trump grr

i repeat. trump grr

1 Like

You posted it. Sure it’s fair game. I had the board open on my 2nd monitor and saw the screen change before and after.

No big deal, if you will check my response addressed “blanket” and not “absentee” until you then mentioned it. I honored your edit.

WW

1 Like