Why government? What if the restaurant decides to do so?
True, no vaccine or medicine in the history of medicine is absolutely 100% effective.
The effectiveness is based on population data not individual cases. As a population vaccines reduce the spread of the disease and the impact on the body if infected. Can an individual still get sick and die, sadly yes.
WW
It is one or the other. You are totally free to skip the vaccine, but partaking is not guaranteed, nor should it be. It is your choice.
1 Like
That is not what HIPAA covers, nor will it ever be.
1 Like
I agree with all of this, those with prior infections should enjoy the same access as the vaccinated.
2 Likes
It however is required by the gasp government.
How dare they interfere with my freedom to drive.
Allan

WuWei:
Actually it is.
No, it isnât. You donât have a right to eat in a restaurant if you pose a risk to other customers or staff. We are in the middle of a pandemic. Privately owned establishments have the right to establish health guidelines they expect customers to follow, or be denied service. This isnât about public accommodation (âWe donât serve your kind hereâ), it is about public health.
1 Like
WuWei
150
14th Amendment. PA laws. Itâs about access.
Private sector isnât make the decision.
1 Like

toreyj01:

WuWei:
Actually it is.
No, it isnât. You donât have a right to eat in a restaurant if you pose a risk to other customers or staff. We are in the middle of a pandemic. Privately owned establishments have the right to establish health guidelines they expect customers to follow, or be denied service. This isnât about public accommodation (âWe donât serve your kind hereâ), it is about public health.
They have the right to do so. I have the right to refuse to show proof of vaccination and the right to never ever frequent said restaurant again even after the virus is over.
That said i doubt local restaurants ever get to that point. They donât even require masks currently.
3 Likes

gooddad409:

toreyj01:

WuWei:
Actually it is.
No, it isnât. You donât have a right to eat in a restaurant if you pose a risk to other customers or staff. We are in the middle of a pandemic. Privately owned establishments have the right to establish health guidelines they expect customers to follow, or be denied service. This isnât about public accommodation (âWe donât serve your kind hereâ), it is about public health.
They have the right to do so. I have the right to refuse to show proof of vaccination and the right to never ever frequent said restaurant again even after the virus is over.
That said i doubt local restaurants ever get to that point. They donât even require masks currently.
All of this is true, I agree with you.
1 Like
I donât see how they can do that in between contracts if theyâre union.
partaking certainly is, its called pursuit of happiness
1 Like
The union agreed to it. Of course itâs the CWA and they endorsed Biden.
https://www.reuters.com/world/the-great-reboot/att-mandates-covid-19-vaccination-union-represented-employees-2021-09-29/
âSome companies have also been working to incentivize employees to get vaccinated through bonuses and other benefits.â
Fat chance with the big company.The only incentive the big company gave me is I get to keep my job.
Allan
amadeus
157

gooddad409:

toreyj01:

WuWei:
Actually it is.
No, it isnât. You donât have a right to eat in a restaurant if you pose a risk to other customers or staff. We are in the middle of a pandemic. Privately owned establishments have the right to establish health guidelines they expect customers to follow, or be denied service. This isnât about public accommodation (âWe donât serve your kind hereâ), it is about public health.
They have the right to do so. I have the right to refuse to show proof of vaccination and the right to never ever frequent said restaurant again even after the virus is over.
That said i doubt local restaurants ever get to that point. They donât even require masks currently.
Restaurants here are not going to suffer because of proof of vaccination refuseniks.

toreyj01:
Businesses can certainly require masks, if they want.
But I think they should also be able to require proof of vaccination, if they want. It is their business, isnât it? And they should be allowed to set terms of employment which they feel is appropriate for their business. Meaning, they can mandate vaccinations for all employees or the employee will be terminated.
Now, will they lose business from the unvaccinated? Sure. Will they face losing valuable employees? Sure. But if they feel it is in their best interest to accept these losses in return for what they feel is a greater gain, does society have a right to tell them they cannot run their business as they see fit? In other words, can we apply socialism here and control the means of production and distribution of a private enterprise?
I believe this to be true as well. Donât like the rules? Donât take the job. And as long as they donât have any competing contract issues, they can do the same with those currently employed as well. In some states they might have an issue with the Implied contract exception for at will states. But I donât believe anyone has used that to challenge it yet.
If the union agreed then itâs over.
Let me ask you a question since I know youâre in favor of all of this. If your job required you to release all medical information as a term of employment, thatâs good too?
find as better big company, walmart paid associates $150
1 Like