Coronavirus Thread Political

[zantax]

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

The response is still out of proportion to the statistics in my opinion.

If we had the data, we’d know whether it was out of proportion.

Since we do not have the data, we don’t know.

The next two weeks will tell the tale. If our emergency care apparatus gets blasted…then we didn’t over-react.

The real question is how long we should do this and when we can lift it.

For that we need data.

You say we won’t have the data for two more weeks. Ok.

We have destroyed our economy based on…

Would you have preferred to see what would have happened had we just let ‘er rip?

Are those the only two options, do nothing or shut everything down?

[JayJay]

By waiting so long we assured that these were pretty much our only two options, yes.

Act earlier, like Taiwan and South Korea then yes…we have more options.

Tell me How I’m wrong on this.

Tell me what you do.

[zantax]

Because I am thinking, maybe only the most vulnerable should be isolated instead of everyone.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

@WuWei

@JayJay

@WuWei

The response is still out of proportion to the statistics in my opinion.

If we had the data, we’d know whether it was out of proportion.

Since we do not have the data, we don’t know.

The next two weeks will tell the tale. If our emergency care apparatus gets blasted…then we didn’t over-react.

The real question is how long we should do this and when we can lift it.

For that we need data.

You say we won’t have the data for two more weeks. Ok.

We have destroyed our economy based on…

Would you have preferred to see what would have happened had we just let ‘er rip?

Argumentum ad absurdem

How about a measured response in proportion to the statistics. A response capable of escalation and considering all risks to the country?

[WuWei]

@JayJay

By waiting so long we assured that these were pretty much our only two options, yes.

Act earlier, like Taiwan and South Korea then yes…we have more options.

Tell me How I’m wrong on this.

Tell me what you do.

Waiting so long for what?

Do the statistics as they stand today warrant destroying the US economy? Because it is already destroyed.

[Cynic]

[JayJay]

@zantax

Because I am thinking, maybe only the most vulnerable should be isolated instead of everyone.

40%-50% of the cases in the hospital/ICU right now are aged 20-54.

Who are the “most vulnerable”?

[JayJay]

Tell me what you would do as of March 11 when the President finally decided maybe we should be doing something.

Tell me now.

[zantax]

@JayJay

@zantax

Because I am thinking, maybe only the most vulnerable should be isolated instead of everyone.

40%-50% of the cases in the hospital/ICU right now are aged 20-54.

Who are the “most vulnerable”?

What is their pre-existing condition status? Because it’s not just the elderly in the high risk category, that includes people of any age with compromised immune systems.

[Jamerican]

Nothing more than a Hustler who not only lack the leadership to handle this crisis, but will continue to fake it until he make it at the expense of the American people and lives.

[zantax]

@JayJay

Tell me what you would do as of March 11 when the President finally decided maybe we should be doing something.

Tell me now.

Isolate the most vulnerable and ramp up the medical supply chain.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

Tell me what you would do as of March 11 when the President finally decided maybe we should be doing something.

Tell me now.

I would have destroyed the economy on January 1st. I don’t ■■■■ around.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Jamerican

Nothing more than a Hustler who not only lack the leadership to handle this crisis, but will continue to fake it until he make it at the expense of the American people and lives.

Absolutely!!

[WuWei]

Great contribution. Both of you.

[Phaedrus]

@tnt

Probably

But…but…he knew it was a pandemic before it was a pandemic! Why didn’t he warn us? Why didn’t he gather his experts and formulate a response, as apparently numerous exercises suggested he should?

Look, none of us know whether the severity of this would have been reduced if Trump had acknowledged it earlier, and been more aggressive in his response. Probably not. But once again, he’s ■■■■■■■■■■■■ us to try to deflect responsibility, and make himself look good. It’s what he does. Most of us have been tired of it for three years. Why aren’t “conservatives”?

[WuWei]

@zantax

@JayJay

Tell me what you would do as of March 11 when the President finally decided maybe we should be doing something.

Tell me now.

Isolate the most vulnerable and ramp up the medical supply chain.

Good answer. Going back further, form the task force, start knocking down red tape.

How many cases and deaths did we have on March 11th?

[JayJay]

@zantax

@JayJay

@zantax

Because I am thinking, maybe only the most vulnerable should be isolated instead of everyone.

40%-50% of the cases in the hospital/ICU right now are aged 20-54.

Who are the “most vulnerable”?

What is their pre-existing condition status? Because it’s not just the elderly in the high risk category, that includes people of any age with compromised immune systems.

Tell us your plan to execute this.

[WuWei]

@Phaedrus

Look, none of us know whether the severity of this would have been reduced if

Is it severe now?

[zantax]

@JayJay

@zantax

@JayJay

@zantax

Because I am thinking, maybe only the most vulnerable should be isolated instead of everyone.

40%-50% of the cases in the hospital/ICU right now are aged 20-54.

Who are the “most vulnerable”?

What is their pre-existing condition status? Because it’s not just the elderly in the high risk category, that includes people of any age with compromised immune systems.

Tell us your plan to execute this.

Same as the current plan, minus low risk groups being told to stay home.

[zantax]

@WuWei

@Phaedrus

Look, none of us know whether the severity of this would have been reduced if

Is it severe now?

The panic and response is.