what was congress and democrats doing while this virus started spreading earlier in the year?
1 Like
enki
4542
Chances are that he has it as well as others in his circle. But, thereās also a chance that they could be the people who show little to no symptoms. If he does fall ill, this will get politically ugly real fast.
Hereās to hoping the White House is better prepared than others.
JayJay
4543
What results?
Our reported rate of growth is pretty much exactly the same as Italyāsā¦we are simply a week or so behind them.
We still can hardly test anyone.
So we donāt know where we will be.
1 Like
WuWei
4544
Not true. Except for the last sentence.
Sknyluv
4547

enki:

Sknyluv:
Hypothetical Question ⦠And Iāll stipulate, even though I detest the man, I donāt wish this upon anyone. If Trump did contract COVID-19, would they tell anyone? I think theyād have to. You couldnāt keep something like that hidden.
Chances are that he has it as well as others in his circle. But, thereās also a chance that they could be the people who show little to no symptoms. If he does fall ill, this will get politically ugly real fast.
Very true. His messaging up to this point has been a mess. If he were more measured with his tone, him getting the virus could be a good teaching moment or example about how to react. But since he download the possibilities, him getting the virus would be a political nightmare.
Adam
4548
enki
4549

WuWei:
Based on what?
Based on the reports of people he has been is contact with who tested positive shortly after.
MoleUK
4550
Not sure what you mean there.
Still not sure where youāre getting the CDC numbers are holding either. Keeping in mind each updated total from the main CDC site is from the day before at 4pm (except weekends where itās friday 4pm):
March 10th (so data as of 4pm march 9th)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-cases/u-s-cdc-reports-696-coronavirus-cases-death-tally-of-25-idUSKBN20X2G2
March 11th (so data as of 4pm march 10th)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-cdc/u-s-cdc-reports-987-coronavirus-cases-death-tally-of-29-idUSKBN20Y2IY
March 12th (so data as of 4pm march 11th)
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-cases/cdc-reports-1264-coronavirus-cases-death-tally-of-36-idUSKBN20Z2UV
March 13th will release in a few hours, which will be the data as of march 12th 4pm. The extra 49 cases in each count (so 1264 instead of 1215) is because of the 49 repatriated cases which the CDC site seperates.
And no itās not Reuters data, theyāre been linking directly to the CDC site/numbers.
To reiterate, the current count as of March 13th 12:33pm is 1701 cases, the CDC numbers released on its main site today will be from March 12th 4pm.
Cynic
4551
WuWei
4552
Balderdash. President Pence would be the best thing that ever happened to this country.
1 Like
MoleUK
4554

WuWei:
Then why arenāt you?
The previous days data that you were asking for isnāt on the site anymore, or at least not that I can find.
And because itās already out of date. The number released today (for yesterdays partial count) wonāt update again till Monday, through the official CDC site.
But they will keep providing numbers to the various other counts going on (NYtimes, Johns Hopkins etc).
As to why the CDC is choosing to release info this way on itās official siteā¦
.
WuWei
4555
Then link to the 1700 number today please.
MoleUK
4556
CDC site wonāt have todays data until noon Monday. At which point they will be releasing Sundays data as of 4pm.
ETA: Johns Hopkins just revised downwards from 1700 to 1253 again, donāt ask me why.
Yes thatās absurd, but itās the way the CDC site is currently setup to release info.
JayJay
4557
Happening at the local and individual level.
Trump gets no credit for that.
Indeed his āthis is no big dealā attitude probably has confused the ā ā ā ā out of a lot of people and led to the panic.
WuWei
4558
CDC not John Hopkins.
Then link to yesterdayās number on the CDC site.
tnt
4560
Keep in mind thousands of people are not getting tested.