Camp
7837
Tiny percent of cases does not compare to a large percent of deaths.
Then add in the fact that Wolf failed to respond.
I understand that this is painful to see CV19 panic fall apart.
It was never able to match the hype, even with the inflated data.

Why use percentages? Use raw numbers.
Is there a threshold for fraud?
JayJay
7840
But only “fraud” that goes “one direction” is worth getting up in arms over…right?
JayJay
7841
The lady who blew the whistle on Florida’s numbers cooking was transparent…not Florida’s government.
Georgia’s problem, of course, is officials there believe April comes after May, and Sunday occurs two times a week. 
Camp
7842
Fraud is a cover up, not a wind direction.

tnt
7843
How is 90K americans dead not a falling sky?
zantax
7844
Ask me again after we see the economic fall out.
tnt
7845
These are not separate tragedies.
Why do you think it’s a binary choice? Try to save lies OR try and save the economy?
What dod you think the economic cost would have been to having no mitigation efforts in place, but deaths 4x their levels now?
Would you have preferred that?
zantax
7849
Talk about binary, were those the only two choices, complete shutdown nationwide or do nothing at all? Please.
2 Likes
WuWei
7850
“We are making our decisions based on science, the data!”
2 Likes
tnt
7852
No. We could have instituted testing and tracking, but we didn’t. We could have done a lot of things.
But really, now, even within states, there is a great disparity in terms of the response. PA has areas in near lockdown, and other areas with a great deal of the economy open, for example.
tnt
7854
90,000 of our brothers and sisters.
WuWei
7855
1 Like
zantax
7856
Yes now, after extensive damage has been done that could very well end up costing more lives than the virus. Not to mention economic misery. All fueled by completely misleading and inflated early “mortality rates”