WildRose:
Krandor:
Nemesis:
This was the correct course of action for the police department and probably should have been done sooner but its done now.
Regardless of the reason why, if she does not have the where with all to correctly identify her own apartment then she obviously does not have appropriate skill set to be a police officer.
Though something tells me there is something more to this story.
It was the right course of action after going through an investigation which looks like what they did.
This whole story has never sat well with me. Even if we believe her story 100% it fails for me on the “reasonable person” standard.
Here is what I mean. I’m going to assume I’m the homeowner. By her story she came in and gave commands. Since she is a police office I’d assume she would identify herself as such by force of habit if nothing else. If you think you are walking into an intruder at your home I think police training would kick in. Now if I’m sitting at home in the dark and I hear somebody come into my home and identify themselves as police I’m going to be confused but you can damn well believe I’m going to follow to follow their commands. Even if she didn’t identify as police if somebody comes into my home with a gun and I’m not armed I’m going to do what they say. So I have a big issue with the “she gave him commands and he didn’t obey so she shot him” and that is from her own account.
So I agree something about this story smells and I’m not sure what it is since evidenlty the two didn’t know each other.
It feels like something is missing in the story because I can’t find any way where the story really makes sense.
He was quite likely high as a kite and in shock trying to figure out what was going on while under the influence.
If she had been in her own apartment her actions would have been perfectly lawful and quite reasonable.
The fact she immediately called 911 and told them exactly what happened which matches her later statements made to police give a lot of credence to the claim she just entered the wrong apartment.
A tragic mistake for which she will pay. Even if she somehow managed to beat the charge in court she’ll never be a cop again nor will she ever have a normal life. She’ll have to live the rest of her life knowing what she did whether behind bars or not.
At a minimum she’s going to almost certainly be convicted of either Negligent Homicide or Manslaughter and pay the price accordingly.
Stop trying to see her side and feel sorry for her… Sheesh man
3 Likes
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 3:53am
1006
She’s the one who will be on trial. What was going though her head that night is the difference between Capital Murder, Manslaughter, and Negligent homicide.
If you can’t put yourself in her shoes you cannot judge the case based on anything other than emotion.
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 5:41am
1007
Let’s put another dead horse back under the barn.
They didn’t have to get a warrant to search Guyger’s apartment, she gave consent for it to be searched the night of the shooting.
A consensual search was conducted on Guyger’s apartment in the hours after the shooting, according to information WFAA obtained from a source close to the investigation that was later confirmed by Merritt.
Ah, look whose back from suspension. I said it was an interesting article. Never said anything in it was true. Try reading, or do you enjoy attacking people for no reason?
1 Like
What? Just because there was weed in his apartment?
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:05pm
1011
That, the fact it indicates heavy use and the fact he reacted the way he did.
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:06pm
1012
You haven’t been attacked, try learning to read what is posted instead of reacting to your own imagination.
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:06pm
1013
What an amazing grasp of the obvious.
The dead man is not facing trial, the shooter is.
come on man. the murdered guy might have been smoking a joint or drinking some beer. he had to be hammered.
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:12pm
1015
Which explains his reactions to her entry and orders for him to surrender.
Altered states tend to not be best for people in an emergency.
Having weed in your apartment indicates “heavy use”? How he reacted? Based on what, the story told by the person who killed him?
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:13pm
1017
The amount and number of already prepared joints do not indicate a casual occasional user.
the dude was probably in his apartment binge watching Grey’s Anatomy or something.
now, that can’t be the picture that’s painted by people that support the cop. he has to have been doing something sinister or help cause his own murder. has to.
1 Like
Its surreal. @wildrose is literally doing everything he can to paint a big sympathy scene for the officer.
There were only 10 grams found. You dont know what you’re talking about. Quit smearing and blaming the victim and taking the cop at her every word.
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:19pm
1023
Sympathy how? She is the one that will bear the consequences of her actions for life and will be looking at probably 2-20 at a minimum. Every day she wakes up for the rest of her life her punishment will be reaffirmed when she remembers where she is and what it cost her.
WildRose
September 25, 2018, 12:19pm
1024
33 joints ready to go. No smear, just facts. Only one person in that apartment had a lawful use of deadly force and it wasn’t Guyger.
WildRose:
33 joints ready to go.
And? You ever meet people who roll their own cigarettes?