They found weed in his apartment too.
Doesn’t mean it was his.
Damn you’re lazy. These links are all over the place.
http://amp.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/dallas/article218154635.html
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/crime/article218333735.html
The arrest report and the search warrant contradict each other because her story has changed multiple times. I hate having to do other people’s work for them. Do us a favor and try to keep up.
1 Like
So the cops are supposed to suppress a report that is a matter of public record unlawfully?
Neither the DA nor the police scheduled the funeral. Why are you so troubled by the transparency?
Exactly. It could have been hers.
Did you bother reading it? The warrant was issued before Guyger was interviewed and the supposed witnesses gave contradictory accounts of what they heard and saw.
She was immediately detained at the scene and the investigation began as soon as the police arrived.
When all else fails, troll out the race card.
Demonstrate exactly how race played a part in either the shooting or the investigation.
BlueTex
600
Interesting item on page 5 in the warrants… From the return and inventory…
(4) Gunshot residue from door frame and kitchen wall of apartment #1478
Why is there gunshot residue on the door frame?
Above the law how exactly? What law has been ignored or overlooked in this case?
She’s been arrested, charged, and will be convicted. What more do you want exactly a lynch mob?
It was made public because it’s a matter of public record and they cannot legally suppress it.
As many times as it’s been explained to you Jo why exactly are you asking again?
It isn’t hard to understand with just minimal effort.
All they would have to do is ask her permission. The police can lawfully perform a security check as well even without a warrant.
The story isn’t true. The search proved she was standing inside the entry way when she fired and that he was 15-20’ further in.
Your picture proves absolutely nothing.
BlueTex
607
Or he left his bowl on the table maybe?
Who said he was sitting? Evidence?
When and where did this shooting take place. Provide a link.
There are parts of this story that are just bizarre.
You’re making things up. If you shoot someone for hurting your dog you’re at a minimum going to face charges of attempted murder.
Castle doctrine does not apply to animals and only applies when you have a lawful use of deadly force to begin with.
The other hole in your story is the juror. If the case had never gone to trial there never would have been a jury selected.